Awaiting reviewer assignment for a long time example As the Editor has not responded to an email, I would contact the Editorial Office (or journal Admin assistant) to follow up on the matter. This also takes time. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. Reviewer assignments (i. " If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. The two statuses shown are the two possible outcomes of this stage: if your paper clears the initial screening, it will be sent out for peer review, but if it doesn't clear, it will be sent to the EiC for desk rejection. That does not necessarily mean your paper is actually waiting on reviewers to be chosen. Awaiting Reviewer Selection EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. During the peer-review process, submitted articles are assessed by a panel of experts, known as reviewers, who evaluate the competence, importance and What do reviewers look for? This will vary from title to title, for example a journal with a strong research focus will put more emphasis on research methodology, while journals publishing case studies will focus on the quality of the case and accompanying teaching note. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? Editor here. Status changed to Editor Assigned. If all the reviewers accept the invitations, the peer review process will start and the status will change to "Under review. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. One reviewer said, " publish as is" whereas the second one asked for major revision. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" For example, the editor or the editor's assistant might have reset the number of referees needed, maybe to correct an initial error, or just incidentally by Assigning paper to suitable reviewers is of great significance to ensure the accuracy and fairness of peer review results. Their latest update, received on 14/11/2023, stated: "We are currently waiting for the final reviewer's comments and will reach out as soon as a decision has been reached. I submitted a short paper to a math journal more that one month ago. Resources for authors and journals Upvote this Answer; Comment. Can I send a email to AE? Dear Dr. However, sometimes, the AE is not satisfied with the reviews and feels the need for an additional review. It’s more common to have a challenge finding peer I submitted a paper, and it took 10 days to be assigned editors and reviewers. ’ Now, it is almost a month since the status changed to ‘Awaiting EIC Decision. Under Review may be same with Awaiting Reviewer Scores, Awaiting Referee Scores, and Manuscript Assigned to For example, journals can configure status changes that give authors transparency into various stages within the review process that the submission will move through. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I want to know how long will this status last. As the Editor has not responded to The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. Within less than two months it came for minor revision. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Our SAP Certified Associate C_TS4CO_2021 practice exam questions are available at any time, anywhere, at your convenience, whether you want to prepare offline or 2. ” You can wait for some more time to see if the status changes. Recall that AEs of most journals are volunteers who have other jobs, go on trips, and have many other responsibilities, so it's not uncommon for a paper to sit I think this means that your paper is currently undergoing the initial editorial screening. Four weeks is a long time for an Editor to sit on a decision. Up to 70% of requests for peer review sent out by journals are rejected by researchers because they have limited time or feel the article they are being asked to assess is After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This would mean that your manuscript would be held in a queue and will be actioned only after other manuscripts have been acted upon. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at BLC is single-anonymous. This change Four weeks is a long time for an Editor to sit on a decision. This question Most likely the assigned reviewer agreed to review but then didn't provide a review, declined to review, or provided a review that made the editor think another review is required. The manuscript awaiting the assignment of an editor for more than two-and-half months is both a bit long and unusual. March 07, 2019: Status changed to "Revision being processed". This change has occurred My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. If not, I would contact them immediately just to check up. In case the status remains at ‘Reviewers Assigned’ for a while, that would mean the AE is having challenges finding After revising and resubmit an article (the first peer review result was "minor revisions"), the status changed after 3 weeks to "Awaiting Decision". In this It typically means that the paper has been received, has been put in the work queue of the editor, but the editor has not assigned reviewers. Then I submitted the revised manuscript in 10 days. Nisar Ahmed, it is very frustrating for a researcher to wait for such long time. There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon That way, less reviewer time is wasted, and it would have a general downward effect on the number of publications that those grad students and post-docs could amass. I submitted the revision almost 2 months back. After that, it changed to 'Under Review. This change has occurred Once the submission passes these initial checks (so-called ‘Editorial Triage’) the paper is then assigned to two or more suitable peer reviewers. Commented Jun 26, 2020 at 21:04. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" If possible, when declining, they might also suggest alternative reviewers. To check the status of your submission in o Nov 22, 2018: Submitted manuscript. Given the times, waiting 15 days really doesn't seem like that Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. This change has occurred • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. This change One of them got accepted within 10 days, but the status for the other one has been "Awaiting AE assignment" for 15 days now. ’ But this could be because the associate editor (AE) may have had a challenge finding reviewers for your manuscript. Some examples include “editor assigned,” “reviewers invited,” “under review,” “review complete,” “decision pending,” and others. Once the requisite number of reviewers has been assigned, the status will change to “under review. I will disagree. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. I'm not too sure, but the For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. For example, it depends on the journal where you submit. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but 3 weeks of that time it was sitting on the editor’s desk awaiting her decision. Now, as you can understand, you’ll have to wait for the reviewers to actually begin reviewing your paper. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. You have three queries. Now it is almost 3 weeks. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. 3 months later, got an email saying "Editor Decision - Revise before review"March 06, 2019: Sent the revised manuscript. This change has occurred Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. "The HELP section says: "Revisions Being Processed have Since the reviews have come in, the AE should ideally not take too long to give his recommendation. This change has occurred What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to The editor(s) has/ve difficulties finding reviewers for the paper; The time frame is "normal" for the journal, "with editor" includes review time. More In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. What can this mean? The platform is I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. , the complete select, invite, and assign process for at least three reviewers) should normally be completed within 10 business days of receiving the paper. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. Related reading: What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? I submitted my revised manuscript to a mathematical journal since 12-04-2017. On 4/26, the status on ScholarOne changed to awaiting decision. – Parnian. The first read is used to form an initial impression of the work. How long I should wait for the final verdict? Hi. How can I check the status of my submitted paper? Modified on Fri, 27 Oct 2023 at 04:59 PM. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. ’ It is a After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 'Reviewers assigned' indicates that experts have been sent an invitation to evaluate your paper, while 'under review' suggests that your manuscript is actively being assessed by reviewers. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. In case if it gets rejected after 8-9 months, it will add up to the chaos of the author. The status "Reviewers contacted" means that the editor has sent out review invitations to the requisite number of reviewers (usually 2 or 3). Some editors keep a paper for a long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision. ' Answer: The journal may take longer than usual time after updating the status as "Ready for decision" if there are many manuscripts to be considered for an editorial decision. Papers that do not meet these criteria will be rejected. Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 I downvoted this answer because by far the most time consuming step is the peer review itself, and "awaiting AE assignment" is a sign that review has not started yet. I sent two emails about updating the status of the paper to editor and Editor-in-Chief several days ago and I got no reply from them. Let’s take them one by one. Sorry! nothing found for. So, why the sudden shift from 'under review' to 'reviewers assigned'? This change typically occurs when one of the original reviewers declines to review your You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. Or (in one system I know of), However I submitted on the 16th September, and the paper still shows 'Awaiting Reviewer Assignment'. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural If a reviewer who agreed to volunteer their time is no longer available or responsive, please feel free to reach out to a new reviewer. The peer-review system is widely regarded as the primary means of ensuring the quality of scientific publications [] and has the potential to enhance the rigour of research in the academic community []. How to handle situation in which the article has been "Awaiting reviewer assignment" for 5 months? 3. Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. It often means we asked 6 people, 3 agreed, 2 said no, and 1 never responded to the request. What Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. My paper submissions (all to the Astrophysical Journal) have all been followed up by the editor within a week of initial submission. the other one move from AE assignment to reviewer selection pretty fast, like in 5 days. The status is "Waiting for reviewer assignment" since 24-4-2017. Ask Question Asked 5 years, 3 months ago. But until now, 5/17, the status are still "awaiting decision". I submitted a manuscript that went Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. The questions editors ask reviewers After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. It is also possible that the handling editor did find suitable reviewers, but they were not available to review your paper at the time. A month is a long time to go with no word. In other words, at this point, the ball is squarely in the reviewers’ court! The status of my manuscript is "Awaiting AE decision", and it has lasted for nearly four months. Additionally, the journals may delay in making a decision Manuscript changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to " awaiting AE reccommendation" to "awaiting EIC decision" within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. Awaiting Reviewer Scores I submit my manuscript to IEEE WCL on 4/14/2019 (Minor revision). I just thought after all reviewer scores, getting the editor decision would be a relatively faster process. I have sent two pieces of mail to AE to inquire of the status, but I have not received any reply. Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more than Status stuck at Awaiting Editor Assignment. After that, it took three weeks for ‘Awaiting reviewer scores. All the best for your submission! Answered by Editage Insights on 21 Dec, 2021 . The number of times your manuscript status has changed to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and then back to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ reflects the challenge the editor is For more information, you may refer to this similar query by another researcher: What can I do if my submission remains 'Awaiting Reviewer Assignment' for a long time? For more on withdrawing your manuscript, you I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. if the manuscript needs to be sent back to the authors for revisions (major or minor) or accept the I submitted a manuscript which got reviewed. Now the handling editor assigned to your manuscript will go through the reviewers comments and decide the next steps for the manuscript i. In the past three decades, many researchers have made a wealth of After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. Regards, Cite The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. Meaning of ‘Awaiting Editor Assignment’ This means that your manuscript has cleared the admin check, that is, it was found matching the journal’s scope and also adhering to the journal’s guidelines, apart from a cursory check of the novelty and quality of the study. Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. Still the status is same. This seems very slow and inefficient- to leave the paper sitting there for two After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This change has occurred What can I do if my submission remains 'Awaiting Reviewer Assignment' for a long time? Hope this helps. 7. This phenomenon has been occurring for quite a long time (Duggan 2007), appears more frequently in papers There’re numerous factors that can affect the peer review time. This change has occurred Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. Being in "reviewer invited" state for a long time before changing to "under review" : Is this a bad sign. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. . At least two of the common review systems show "awaiting reviewer selection" if there is ANY reviewer invitation outstanding. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. I suggest you try to figure out how long the time from submission to accept/reject (turnaround I submitted my manuscript to a journal. " I don't think you should worry because this does not look like a case of desk rejection. Do not email to ask about Coming to your present query, as we just indicated, this has been a slow change from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘Under Review. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which It’s quite common for editors to select a lot of reviewers, but only invite a few at a time. Review is Conducted. The status is still "awaiting assignment" and I checked the online system which shows that even no editor has been assigned to my paper. After one week, the status changed to 'Reviewers Assigned,' and it remained so for one day. After two and half months the status got changed from awaiting reviewer scores to awaiting recommendation. If major problems are found at this stage, the reviewer may feel comfortable rejecting the paper without further work. However, yesterday the status reverted back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". e. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for the journal. I'm an Assistant Professor and I get far more review requests than I could ever handle, at the same time that my institutional service responsibilities are ramping up (fewer T-T I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. The reviewer sets time aside to read the paper several times. This rather ambiguous stage is when reviewers have been invited, but we are waiting for the required number to agree to review. (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again (Awaiting Popular Articles. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. This change has occurred UgkR4R‡ ÀÕ=$¢²×ÃN °9iõ¨Z$d^°úãן þûO Á¸û ´lÇåöx}~_¾ÍúïäçËÑ« {ñ¹ Œg^BÈÍ È1¤R²Ý6 Yr$ ›0üo~³ÿ “ÑŽéÆU »J’ý Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. ' Now, after three weeks, the status date of the manuscript has changed, but the status remains 'Reviewers Assigned. The status of the paper changed several times. " Anybody know how long it should take a journal to assign reviewers to an article? I have had a piece under review for over 2 months, and the online status is still "awaiting reviewer assignment," even though authors are encouraged to suggest the potential reviewers (which I The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a Viewed 2k times 0 . ' However, after 15 days, it again changed to 'Reviewers Assigned. At present, the status is "Reviewers assigned. This would explain the status change from "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection. This change has occurred After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. well I'm not sure. But today suddenly the status changed back to I submitted a paper to some journal. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. If that is the case, This status typically means your manuscript is awaiting assignment to an editor after the initial review of the submission. Depending on the journal's workflow, this status could also indicate when the editorial office determines if To mitigate these challenges, solutions for automated association of papers with "well matching" reviewers - the task often referred to as reviewer assignment problem (RAP) - have been the subject Some editors keep a paper for long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision and when send them a reminder message they do not reply or sometimes reply for the first time saying that As per my personal experience with IOP Journal(s), the status "Awaiting Referee Report" implies that the reviewers are already assigned and review work is in-progress. 3.