Github actions vs jenkins reddit. Valheim; Genshin Impact; .

Github actions vs jenkins reddit If the employer is using Github they will likely Github Actions is like if you just want the corkscrew out of the entire swiss army knife that Jenkins gives you. That can be very frustrating. subscribers . GitHub offers great features and a great user experience for their SCM offerings. Most developers are comfortable with picking up any build tool you put in front of them and those are both solid options. It would appear that there is no way to push the event handling into the "Reusable" part of the workflow/pipeline. I can gauge a senior vs junior Jenkins admin just by their plugin count. I've also used Github actions for quite a while, it's just a lesser version of Azure pipelines currently but as already stated, it gets features a lot faster so may take over pipelines at some point. Also did some changes on my private ci/cd workflows by replacing jenkins with gitea actions (changed the default action source to github) and it works like a charm all in one tool really awesome. To have a clear and single way of how to do deployments (automated ops tests for deprecation and policies; adding new features e. You get image and layer caching (it's complicated), but nothing else. This will contribute to higher GitHub actions can do a whole lot more than just CI! You've got basically the whole API at your fingertips as inputs and outputs. I think it's better to use a separate product for CD than the above listed . So you can't really mix GHA agents and self hosted agents. This post includes what is arguably the most popular newcomer to the group of CI/CD service providers, GitHub Actions. tech GitHub Actions: Jenkins: Integration with GitHub: GitHub Actions is natively integrated with GitHub, providing seamless collaboration within the same environment. Migrating off Azure DevOps over to Octopus Deploy (deployment) and GitHub Actions (build) cut our build times in half, enabled our teams to self-serve a hell of a lot more, and whilst Haven’t used Jenkins in years, it was a nightmare. Project complexity plays a significant role. if you configure GPT to post answers to Hello fellow developers! I have a project, running on Gitlab, with using of it's CI configs and so on. The first one I built I used GitHub actions, to build a simple ETL pipeline that collects data from multiple APIs, processes the data, the loads the data into spreadsheets and creates file backups in a GCP bucket. Overall, if you are using GitHub, then I would recommend GitHub Actions. g GitHub actions for github). In rest, pull requests erau merge requests, dar tot git era. GitHub Actions, introduced in 2018, is a CI/CD platform that’s tightly integrated with GitHub Personally coming off of Jenkins, Bamboo, TeamCity and others it is much less complex than those but I could see it being overwhelming coming from GitHub. Reply reply Professionally I’m still stuck in the jenkins space unfortunately. Github Actions vs CircleCI . Or check it out in the app stores   Any benefit to running tests in an azure devops pipeline vs a Jenkins pipeline I set up myself? Share Add a Comment. And you have to update Jenkins and its plugins. The question is how easy is it do thing X with Jenkins vs with Github Actions. GitHub’s platform is the most widely used Git platform on the planet, and it has extensive functionality beyond just Actions – including defect and project You will be happier with circle ci, github actions or gitlab, literally anything else. Jenkins can handle build and test stages, while Argo CD can manage the deployment and monitoring of applications in a Kubernetes environment. Github Actions just feels better, built on the principle of As you and others said, Jenkins is on its way out the door. It is pretty convenient and maintainable, but since now Github managed to implement actions it seems also interesting. Azure DevOps is on it's last legs. r/DevOpsAuthority. Scripted pipeline VS declarative pipeline: Jenkins use a DSL that is hard to understand and has 2 modes scripted and declarative. The compilation of the C++ code-base is quite demanding and these SaaS CI offerings are quite meager in terms of hardware specs. I personally found it OK. Or, if you think Jenkins may be the tool for you, you can learn more about Jenkins with ACG’s Learn Jenkins by Doing collection of hands-on labs or our Jenkins Fundamentals courses. github root to my cluster. Jenkins is better at handling running a mixed set of agents base on their labels than GitHub actions. Jenkins uses a Groovy-like syntax when defining a pipeline, whereas Azure DevOps and GitHub Actions use YAML. That's why the started JenkinsX, I had enough of jenkins about 10 years ago and started moving and designing systems with more modern agile systems like argo, github actions, buildkite, and A community for sharing and promoting free/libre and open-source software (freedomware) on the Android platform. This article will explore the top features and differentiators between GitHub Actions can be used both self-hosted and as a SaaS, whereas Jenkins is self-hosted only. They clearly and admittedly prioritize breadth over depth in features. I think GitHub has a small price associated for more "jobs" but it's also free generally. This way many projects can share a common declarative Jenkinsfile. Or check it out in the app stores but I think your time is better spent focusing on tools with broader usage going forward like Gitlab or Github Actions. If you want to grab 50 GPUs to run machine learning as part of your build, nothing beats Argo Workflows. Jenkins is horrific to manage. Also also also, use something like cookie-cutter for a pre built template, or Jenkins with plugins, or GitHub actions where you can steal another pipeline or whatever that someone has already made. Extensibility: Both Jenkins and GitHub Actions support extensibility through plugins and actions, respectively, allowing users to integrate with third-party tools and services. They're both just glorified script runners that can also execute in containers. Final one was we needed to update Java, and had a helluva time with that Pros and Cons of GitHub Actions and Jenkins. Pipelines are defined using different languages – GitHub Actions relies on YAML, while Jenkins uses Groovy. Low Barrier to Entry: GitHub Actions offers a seamless setup process with no hardware Notably, Jenkins cost you $0, GitLab costs you $0 self-hosted or what looks like $0 for their SaaS offerings. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. GitHub Actions: An Overview. Which tool has better support for Git integration? View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. No native caching. Github Actions are okay, but again, the integration with Boards is too nice. Jenkins boasts over 1,500 plugins that extend its capabilities. However it can be easier to deploy your code on aws account as it is already part of the aws ecosystem. We are changing from a CI/CD linear sequential monolithic pipeline (Jenkins), a Waterfall process, into asynchronous component-based pipelines closer to Last time I worked with Gitlab CI it was waay mature than Github actions. Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities . Log In / Sign Up; Advertise on Reddit; Shop Collectible Avatars; Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. The benefit to gitlab is you can run an on-prem server so your code is kept in-house, then run the playbook with a gitlab-runner (similar to GitHub actions). This allows easy access to internally hosted services and sensitive data when a workflow run needs it. It will look like you can just ignore it and add plugins as you go, but eventually you will realize that it's a shitshow and you have to spend a lot of time cleaning things up and getting it back into shape. Internet Culture (Viral) Amazing We replaced Jenkins with GitHub Actions. We can do that easily with ArgoCD pull model (in Flux as well). The challenge with GitHub Actions is they are designed to run directly on The Jenkins UI is fairly horrible, but the scripted pipeline is nice. GitHub Actions recently A lot of Jenkins haters are also those that install plugins for every damn task they need done. De cand au aparut Github Actions am trecut inapoi pe Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. The initial designers have called the original Jenkins a frankenstien. More posts from r/DevOpsAuthority subscribers GITHUB ACTIONS VS CIRCLE CI. Also, GitHub runners being ephemeral is a bonus because you don't need to worry about the build agents getting out of whack and causing people's builds to fail for some mysterious reason. While they have some similarities, they also have distinct features and approaches. Jenkins: Neither of these tools is ultimately "better"; that really depends on what you're looking for. Azure Repos, GitHub, BitBucket, they are all pretty much the same product, just different UIs. GitHub Actions is great for teams wanting something quick to set up, easy to manage, and pretty tight in its integration with GitHub. Jenkins is an alternative to gitlab CI/CD. Internet Culture (Viral) Amazing I also like CircleCI and GitHub Actions although Actions is still a bit immature at this point. com access to run terraform against their production environments. 5. Jenkins requires more time to Github Actions is the way to go, IMO. It's popularity since its launch just ~4 years ago now has been nothing short of meteoric. It currently only supports building on x86. Argo CD, though, isn't a direct Jenkins replacement like GitLab or GitHub Actions. . AI-powered Automation: Jenkins: Jenkins could leverage Maintenance: Jenkins deployments are typically self-hosted, with users maintaining the servers in their own data centers. My main crux with jenkins x is the lack of good visualizations, as well as alternatives to chat ops. Jenkins(X) is a hustle-full, with tons of vulnerabilities coming up everyday. It's very beneficial to learn Jenkins concepts and under stand things like declarative pipelines and how to expose those pipelines as shared libraries. out to the CloudFormation actions, so our CodePipeline unexpectedly broke. Gaming. As the CI/CD landscape evolves, both Jenkins and GitHub Actions face exciting opportunities and challenges: 1. Jenkins is great, but a lot of people are also leaving Jenkins for GitHub Actions. It adds up. The good part is that if you do have to write an action, you can publish it as a container image, so you can write it in whatever language you want. So currently we have one older instance of Jenkins we have running, and myself coming in and introducing a number of DevOps concepts and having some say with web, we got another instance of Jenkins While Jenkins can integrate with GitHub through plugins, the process may not be as smooth or intuitive as with GitHub Actions. BTW, our jenkins alternative is Cloudbees so it's really apples to apples in the enterprise space. Github argument. com Open. As for the gitea runner I am using a docker image for it and no problems so far In terms of the way Actions alarms me is the marketplace approach. Sure Github Actions has a nice community built actions. Both Jenkins and GitHub Actions is the CI/CD functionality within the GitHub platform. com/abhishekprd Hi Everyone, Today's class we will learn about GitHub Actions1. It's definitely a better option than Jenkins and its complex interface. For source control purposes it's ok, for CI/CD it's not great/user friendly. We are in the process of converting all our pipelines over and finally Github Actions vs CircleCI vs TravisCI Hi guys, I love Github Actions as I write code, manage issues, and do everything within Github, Github Actions are just my preferences. However, one of the major draws of Jenkins for users is the customizability of using the multitude of plugins available. Pros and Cons Travis CI Pros TeamCity, Github Actions, and Jenkins What I like to use each one for. They have been around for a long time and are also the most popular SCM provider in the world. Jenkins We use the type keyword to define different step types, and we will have a step type specifically for actions. Github Actions to build, test, and publish artifacts (docker images, nuget packages, and helm charts) then Octopus Deploy to update helm charts in EKS. Moving from Gitlab to Jenkins is moving in the opposite direction. Or check it out in the app stores   (Jenkins, Gitlab, Travis, CircleCI). You will not need to concern yourself with maintaining a Continuous Integration server Jenkins can be immensely useful but the plugin update issues, monolithic nature, and still stabilizing IaC aspects lend itself to more traditional SysAdmin and less automated. Even with a slashed down version of features I consider gitlab to be way better for casual use. I’m assuming you are using GitHub to host your source code, in which case the integration with your software workflow will be really tight with GitHub Actions. Bitbucket pipelines are impossible to stitch together. From my experience multi-repository pipelines (where repository A wants something like artifacts or CI pipeline results from repository B) is complete garbage currently on Also building CI/CD pipelines are much more difficult as you need to rely on other AWS services. Facebook X Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram. CDK Pipelines made setting up CodePipeline easier. Are we talking about secrets used at runtime of the apps? and intentions. AutoModerator • HOW TO DEPLOY MULTIPLE ENVIRONMENTS USING It’s one of Jenkins’s powerful features. Azure Static Web Apps will connect to your code repo and build a ci/cd pipeline to deploy a static web app, but only on Github. Gitlab CI and Github Actions is the same Gitlab vs. My . Jenkins VS GitHub Actions comparison, am I missing anything? Github Actions was released in November 2019 which makes it pretty new and it has some flaws that need to be fixed overtime. Currently I primarily use TeamCity for almost all of my pipelines and GitHub Actions is for my web projects that I host on netlify. The biggest issue I am having is the event handling. Personally I'd say you're better sticking to managed services like BB Pipelines or GitHub actions unless you're a large company or running very large build jobs. Right now though, less features, less flexibility and the same For better or for worse, Jenkins can be bent to do a lot of unique things that GitHub actions would require custom actions for. GH Actions won by a landslide. [Devops] Gitlab CI vs Jenkins vs GitHub Actions Je veux me concentrer sur l'apprentissage des pipelines CI / CD et j'ai recherché l'outil à apprendre. While Jenkins handles your whole CI/CD dance (building, testing, deploying), Argo CD is a sleek specialist, focusing on the Jenkins VS GitHub Actions comparison, am I missing anything? youtube. Internet Culture (Viral) Amazing You can trigger a longer build from github actions and forget. With Jenkins and GitHub, we'd constantly run into problems where jobs would fail because we hit GitHub's API limits. Jenkins 🎯. Locked post. Jenkins, known for its versatility, handles complex pipelines with ease. Be the first to comment GITHUB ACTIONS VS CIRCLE CI devopsauthority. 19 recently introduced initial support for Gitea Actions, which are +1 Gitlab and try Concourse. WHICH IS BETTER? TRAVIS CI VS JENKINS. GitHub Actions is listening to git events. It integrates both CloudBees CI and CloudBees CD/RO, along with native support for tools like Jenkins, Kubernetes, and GitHub Actions-style workflows. GitHub actions also supports many more events like the adding of a label or the closing of a PR As someone who builds on top of github actions [1], we end up noticing issues ~30-90 mins before an incident is opened on the github status page. Book a demo. Share Add a Comment. I'd rather have the chat-ops-y commands be printed to me on github, having to run the actual commands manually, rather than giving i. However, there are differences between them in Github Actions vs Jenkins: Further comparison is shown in tabular form below: N/B: GitOps is the practice of managing infrastructure and configuration using Source Version Control Platform Git. If we're talking about just pipelines, they're both going to do the job. A delay between 3 and 10 minutes or so is to be expected. Do not bother. If you are interested in a product that can orchestrate provisioning, configuration, Support my workhttps://www. Jenkins is great, but if you can pick something else, pick something else. The result is that when a new repository is created in a Github org Jenkins will both create the job and select a pipeline for it. But let's be honest, I don't know of recent projects adopting Jenkins when GitHub and gitlab already provided built-in and free hosting solutions for their CI/CD technology (for open source GitHub repository there's also Travis CI — another How to Choose Between Jenkins and GitHub Actions. VS2019 introduced "create a new git repository" quick action and Github was the only option" they only added AZDO after a lot of community feedback. e. Terms & Policies WHICH IS BETTER? TRAVIS CI VS JENKINS. Azure DevOps/Pipelines hasn't changed much since the GitHub acquisition and I don't see much innovation/improvement there. Or check it out in the app stores Home TRAVIS CI VS JENKINS devopsauthority. GitHub Actions vs Circle CI - DevOps Authority devopsauthority. But Github actions still has a 107K subscribers in the github community. Its even cheap to run, and runs fine on preemptible nodes. GitHub Actions. Over the course of 2 years we moved from github to gitlab and back to github, because of those reasons. When deciding between Jenkins and GitHub Actions, several factors guide your choice. But what we can agree: Jenkins is old-fashioned trash, where you store configs inside of UI, have ton of vulnerable plugins and have to work with security updates, where you spend days on clicking their UI There is a rich ecosystem of actions, and the scripting language is full-featured for e. Release pipelines are cool, but build pipelines in YAML files are better; I want to switch to purely using build pipeline YAML files for provisioning resources and deploying services, but there’s no visibility in the dashboard for them, which is what the rest of the team relies on. But, we had to switch away because our assets grew over 256MB - CDK passes the entire cdk. YouTube Thumbnail – GitHub Actions vs Circle CI GitHub Actions. After working quite sometime in Github actions and moved to Jenkins, found some interesting insights about both of these excellent time tested tools. com - fast github actions runners. Projects with private codebases will need to pay for runner minutes to ensure their workflows can execute. I In my previous post, I discussed the differences between GitHub Actions vs CircleCI. Or jenkins. GitHub Actions vs. All tools appear to be the same for the most part, but there are two claims made against Jenkins and I would like to know if that is the case from your AWS CodePipeline and GitHub Actions do not cater for ad hoc jobs. Book a Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. As for Jenkins, Synchronous builds are the main We were using CodePipeline because it was the default for CDK Pipelines. Valheim; Genshin Impact; TRAVIS CI VS JENKINS devopsauthority. I would go with GitHub Actions first, to answer your question. You can set up your own runners if you want to play around for free. I don't see Jenkins as adding much value vs cloud-native tools. So, Jenkins is good for flexibility and customization and has GitHub Actions and Jenkins are both continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) tools that help automate the software development process. In my previous post, I discussed the differences between GitHub Actions vs CircleCI. I would rather pay for a service I can consume when I Most SaaS or cloud native style CI/CD systems introduce several seconds of latency between steps in a flow that you can't easily get rid of. A subreddit for all things GitHub! GitHub Actions allows you to express some complicated workflows, so I imagine that is more marketing than reality. It also has fairly simple semantics for building and testing in parallel. EDIT 2: GitHub actually has "minutes" for it's GitHub I have been working on a number of data pipelines recently, which are used to move data, and make updates on a scheduled basis. GitHub is just there, though depending on how many actions you're triggering it can get a little pricey. yml knowledge required). Hi everyone. Github it's great never had an issue with it, either personal or enterprise and Github Actions I heard good things but haven't touched it yet. Jenkins is very much like a swiss army knife, while I feel Actions is more like a specific tool. GitHub actions are supposedly the answer to GitLab's user friendly pipeline capabilities, but To learn more about GitHub Actions, check out the new GitHub Actions Deep Dive course. I had to work with Jenkins and Gitlab before and GitHub actions just seems so clean and easy to work with Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Out of all the self hosted options this one was the easiest. Keep using GitLab if you can, that would be your best option. Below we are going to delve into the depths of GitHub Actions vs Jenkins and overview their key features to help you make an informed choice for your CI\CD needs. Users can create custom workflows or leverage pre-configured action options using an intuitive YAML editor similar to GitHub Actions. Github Actions vs Jenkins: Further comparison is shown in tabular form below: N/B: GitOps is the practice of managing infrastructure and configuration using Source Version Control Platform Git. It's more intuitive and tightly integrated with GitHub. Then things like speed and performance come down to how you use and configure Both Jenkins and GitHub Actions have strengths in automating CI/CD pipelines, but they excel at different needs. So, Jenkins is good for flexibility and customization and has extensive integrations, which it's best suited for enterprise environments and complex workflows, while GitHub Actions shines with ease of use and tight GitHub integration and maintenance, A self-hosted version of GitHub actions would be perfect, like GitLab's CI runner. Introduction to CI\CD tools: Jenkins vs GitHub Actions. True, managing a plugin zoo can get tiring. AWS CodePipeline needs a trigger, and then runs a static pipeline. It allows for extensive customization, making it ideal for projects requiring intricate Now, let’s explore how GitHub Actions and Jenkins approach these crucial processes. there is no way to properly template workflows . I think it is good enough before I've started work with it. Cependant, après avoir mené mes recherches en ligne, j'ai vu beaucoup de preuves convaincantes pour le choix des 3 outils énumérés dans le titre. I was wondering if anyone has had some experience working/trying out both systems, and what they felt were the biggest weaknesses of them? Also want to see if someone has used Github Actions for multiple repos, and how they like that whole process. In earlier posts, I have also compared Travis CI vs CircleCI, Travis CI vs Jenkins, and CircleCI vs Jenkins Jenkins is easy as hell, setup is quite straightforward. Harness provides SaaS and on-prem versions of the product, with feature parity between both. Home. After working in a day to day basis with actions, jenkins and gitlab, I really wonder why they didn't go for gitlab on gittea. TeamCity is challenging when creating pipelines and workflows. upvote r/DevOpsAuthority. My organization is a growing startup, all the codebase is in GitHub and currently I'm If you dont want to manage your machine, CircleCI > Github/Gitlab If your workflow runs on mac (for example, building release for ios applications), CircleCI > Github/Gitlab What people prefer from tools like Gitlab and Github Actions is the capability to We're a 200 developer company and in the proces of migrating everything to GitHub actions. Asynchronous Integration simply means builds are performed simultaneously making the workflow faster. When choosing between GitHub Actions and Jenkins for your CI/CD pipeline, it’s crucial to understand their respective strengths and weaknesses. Description . Cost: Jenkins is open source and free while Github Actions is “Freemium For the rest projects use GitHub Actions or Gitlab CI, those also can have shared pipelines code (infra team can prepare steps or pipelines for development teams to import in projects), there are hosted workers in GH Actions with custom labeling, access control, a market place for steps, and a lot of other features. I feel that GitHub Actions are a bit more rigid as well Azure Repos, GitHub, BitBucket, they are all pretty much the same product, just different UIs. No Scripting Required: GitHub Actions does unfortunately require a decent amount of scripting. For build I am trying hard to find a solution for the secrets management in GitHub, compared to the Jenkins credentials store I find it hard with GitHub to manage the secrets, In Jenkins credentials store, we have wide verity of storing secrets and retrieve the using their ID, but in the GitHub I cannot find a way to do this, does anyone have a better idea to deal this ID based retrieval, Jenkins will let you do a lot more, but understand that it is non-zero work to maintain Jenkins and keep it behaving how you want. Jenkins VS GitHub Actions comparison, am I missing anything? youtube. Jenkins, on the other hand, caters for many types of job. A comparison of Jenkins to GitHub Actions . I'm currently asked to choose from one of the three Jenkins, GitHub actions and Travis CI to use as CI/CD tool but I don't know much about any other tool except for jenkins. We are slowly moving over to GitHub Actions and I cannot wait until we are finally off Jenkins, solely because I don't want to have to manage build agents. I don't use Jenkins anymore, so obviously I find this cost tolerable (I do miss my quick pipelines though). In fact I have 3 repos, which are build tested and then deployed to heroku on each commit on master branch. Although Jenkins does not have a cloud-based offering directly from Jenkins, there are a few hosting providers that offer such an offering. Learn how to integrate CloudBees CD/RO with GitHub using actions in the GitHub Marketplace. It makes it very hard for developers to disable test Jenkins will let you do a lot more, but understand that it is non-zero work to maintain Jenkins and keep it behaving how you want. More posts from r/DevOpsAuthority. We are currently using it in our team and looking to move away especially since Jenkins has a larger community. I’m pretty happy with anything that I don’t have to manage or maintain on my own. For private repos I would like to run on our own infra. This comparative analysis aims to provide an in-depth understanding of both tools, helping development teams make informed decisions based on their project needs and constraints. Doing that ensures consistency across projects which can be crucial in an enterprise environment. Personally I'm most familiar with Azure Repos, but use a fair bit of GitHub as well. Comparisons. Yes, it's still getting new features and is being maintained, but there's been hints. I’ve also used github actions and Gitlab in personal projects. New comments cannot be posted. put them in your CI secretstore (GitHub has one, gitlab and Jenkins as well). Or check it out in the app stores   we are transitioning our ci/cd system (jenkins) to github actions. I heard that Jenkins is a commonly used ci/cd system in the world. Performance also is def worse than with github. We're shedding our Jenkins deployments in favor of GitHub actions - easy peasy, all in one place - highly customizable Jenkins VS Gitlab CI upvotes The official Python community for Reddit! Stay up to date with the latest news, packages, and meta information relating to the Python programming language. My team has seven people, and our company is larger, but there aren't Get app Get the Reddit app Log In Log in to Reddit. TeamCity - TeamCity is an ultimate Continuous Integration tool for professionals. [1] warpbuild. Github actions is too complicated, and depends on inheritance by design, that can be a blessing or a big problem. This means software you are free to modify and distribute, such as applications licensed under the GNU General Public License, BSD license, MIT license, Apache license, etc. Jenkins was on our own AWS server, and the updates got to be a nuisance. GitLab and GitHub are the best. Like this: steps: - type: action spec: with: key1: val1 key2: val2. Simple difference is Jenkins is a server based and Github actions is a serverless Between TeamCity and Jenkins, I prefer the latter. You want to spend more time writing your code, and less time messing with getting it all integrated unless there is an explicit need for a feature you can't get elsewhere. By understanding these limitations and carefully considering your project’s unique needs, you can make an informed decision about whether GitHub Actions or Jenkins is the right CI/CD tool for you. automatically detect programming language to Tag running applications) we use Jenkins for CD. For example, if you move from Jenkins to either GitHub Actions or Azure DevOps, you face a complete shift in syntax. Whether you need to interact with cloud providers, If you use GitHub, you're best off with Actions / Circle. However Jenkins has great support for plugins which allows you to encapsulate build logic. There are external source external destination secrets (f. One thing to look at is We use both. Ca interfata era putin mai greu de folosit, poate e doar UX dar github se misca mai bine si vedeam mai usor schimbarile. The three CI services seem to have not much of difference to the others, though TravisCI may a bit behind. Jenkins and GitHub Actions are both popular tools used in the field of software development for implementing continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines. Or check it out in the app stores     TOPICS. GH actions are relatively new, so naturally, the product is still maturing and can only become better. TeamCity Pros. Top 7% The first thing to understand about GitLab vs Jenkins is that GitLab is a suite of different tools, whereas Jenkins is just for pipelines. The platform's extensibility allows organizations to integrate additional tools VS2019 introduced "create a new git repository" quick action and Github was the only option" they only added AZDO after a lot of community feedback. At a previous company, we started POCing GitHub actions and I loved it. Disadvantages: GitHub actions (still?) has sometimes surprisingly foundational limitations at this point (june 2019). With that being said, bending Jenkins to do your will has a You may also want to consider a locally hosted Gitea. 16K. the haed part in jenkins maybe the scaling to multiple nodes agents, but it is not the case you When comparing GitHub Actions and Jenkins, two popular CI/CD solutions, it is essential to understand their unique features, benefits, and limitations. OctopusDeploy seems to be fairly common, but I much prefer Azure Yaml Pipelines. GitLab or GitHub Actions. Reply reply Github Actions vs CircleCI for 'advanced workflows' Foloseam la lucru github, am trecut (un fel de test) pe gitlab, ca avea pipelines si nu mai foloseam jenkins. Jenkins is older, powerful and has an web UI for configuration (no . Reddit iOS Reddit Android Reddit Premium About Reddit Advertise Blog Careers Press. Add your thoughts and get the conversation going. 2 Replies to The k8s integration and the inability to search across code in multiple repos in their SaaS product are more such examples. TL,DR: IMHO, if you're already using GitHub and have solutions for ticket/story tracking then ADO won't offer too much except consolidation unless you're working in Azure to begin with. but the power of jenkins is groovy pipelines, basically one can do everything in Jenkins the way that person wants. Asynchronous Two popular solutions, GitHub Actions and Jenkins, are often pitted against each other as developers seek to determine the most effective solution. Numerous large companies use Jenkins for their CI/CD needs. For me it's a relief. What is the justification for using Copado instead of a more common/industry approach for CI/CD such as jenkins, circle ci, bitbucket pipelines, github actions and other automation tools As an experienced developer that worked not only with Salesforce, could you justify the use of Copado? Both Jenkins and GitHub Actions have strengths in automating CI/CD pipelines, but they excel at different needs. Streamline and centralize your development processes while maintaining developer autonomy. Unless you're working with legacy systems, Actions is Both GitHub Actions and Jenkins provide options for self-hosted runners, but one distinct advantage of GHA self-hosted runners is that we can easily pick and choose when to After our pipelines went down for a few days due to incompatibility with an OS security patch, we evaluated rebuilding Jenkins vs moving to GitHub Actions which our Enterprise account had recently added. GitLab is on the rails easy and good for the majority of teams at a cost. We have worked with a number of different CI tools (including Jenkins, not CB Core though) and the GitHub workflow with actions is really of great value. Tools. Both GitHub Actions and Jenkins are powerful CI/CD tools that allow engineers to automate the SDLC process. ) More specifically on something like github+ actions or github + any other tool. GitLabs CI/CD is pretty good, too. Whatever, the best tool for the job always. Members Jenkins and GitHub Actions have different cost models for their services. Have not tried TeamCity, but I’d only consider it given complex use cases When 1-4 points probably could be applied to GitHub actions, others are related to profits which you can achieve using WoodpeckerCI. Jenkins will do everything but expect some headaches while you learn. tech. Since they use the same syntax, switching between GitHub Actions and Azure DevOps is an easy transition. Things like github actions are still in their infantancy and many companies are not comfortable giving github. Fun Fact: GitHub runners operate in Azure. GitHub Actions - Automate your workflow from idea to production. configuration of secrets and sharing data between actions. You can run bash scripts, maven, ant, powershell etc, to name just a few. --- If you have questions or are new to Python use r/LearnPython For some reason I feel that GitHub Actions is not a good choice, but the only thing that I can think off is that it is a push model, which means we will not be able to block the outside initialized connections to the cluster. (There are plenty of other jenkins problems, but the biggest is just when upgrade time comes. GitHub is still in early stages especially GitHub enterprise which is, as a cloud product, still a bit lack luster. Our devs can do whatever they want with Gitlab-Ci and build their own pipeline of choice or the one we provide as DevOps. It is much lighter weight and easier to configure than GitLab; has a more similar interface to GitHub (if that's what your team is used to); has very nice importers from other Git hosting services, including GitHub, that will pull in issues, PRs, wiki, and all; and Gitea 1. You don’t need to make your own pipeline there are already hundreds out there and they are tailored to the language less your personal code. In earlier posts, I have also compared Travis CI vs CircleCI, Travis CI vs Jenkins, and CircleCI vs Jenkins. If you just want to run a simple build and some tests, GitHub Actions is pretty easy. What is GitHub Actions ?2. Plugins does not match Jenkins version: sometimes you can not update Jenkins BC a plugin is not supported in the new version and vice versa. But when you think the issue with Jenkins is the syntax then you have a lot more to learn than just "GitLab vs Jenkins Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Thanks! comments GitHub Actions and Jenkins are both great choices for managing the CI/CD processes across your application deployment, but generally, they struggle when it comes to infrastructure, especially because you have to build many mechanisms to obtain a decent workflow. devopsauthority. Jenkins is powerful, but steeper learning curve. Since you mentioned price being a factor on Actions you may want to checkout Codefresh (I work there), we've done a lot with the Enterprise version of Argo Without any direct knowledge of GitHub Actions, I would speculate that it might be functionally similar to GitLab CI. It’s a good way to get started but trusting that an action will keep working and evolve as necessary is a huge risk. This is an awesome new player in the CI/CD pipeline space provided by GitHub. Sort by: AWS GitHub Actions 🚀 Future Trends in CI/CD: Impact on Jenkins and GitHub Actions. The first problem I've met in Jenkins is that for particular things, you have to install a plugin. g. I mostly do this because the Netlify bot for GitHub is quite powerful. CloudBees CD/RO has always embraced developer autonomy in tool choice while acting as an uber orchestrator to Github is the way. Jenkins although is a great tool is not keeping up with new-gen tools. CodeCommit with CodeBuild, etc. For example, let’s consider a pipeline that uses plugins for Git integration and Docker build: 4. Either way, the choice is between the tool integrated with version control and lots of features just automatic, or best of breed tool where you can do anything but it might require more time and experience. This is the main flaw with Jenkins as well. , and software that isn’t designed to restrict you in any way. Easy to config. If i use github actions it is so easy to find already built action that achieves what you want (same goes for other tools like Gitlab, Jenkins). Can I use Jenkins and Argo CD together in my deployment pipeline? Yes, Jenkins and Argo CD can be used together in a deployment pipeline. There's no real need for Jenkins when you can use GitHub actions. Right now though, less features, less flexibility and the same Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Why and Wh Then during auto-discovery Jenkins will examine the contents of the application repo and assign a Jenkinsfile based on rules you create. But GitHub actions really lack some basic stuff like FIFO queue, variable name in the version tag, can't pass secret to reusable workflow etc. They have been around for a long time and are also the most popular SCM provider in the world. They offer extensive customization options – GitHub actions using its marketplace, while Jenkins relies on a powerful plugin ecosystem. Stats . My requirements are: Jenkins was already being used when I joined the company and my time is better spent doing other stuff than getting rid of it. Jenkins and GitHub Actions have different cost models for their services. and this is sometimes quite needed. Nothing was perfect. It integrates easily with your code, and PR workflows are much better. Like ArgoCD or Flux GitHub Actions for CloudBees Continuous Delivery / Release Orchestration (CD/RO) are now available in the GitHub Marketplace. Additionally, you can setup your self-hosted runners on Actions if you think you can run the computer cheaper at scale. GitHub Both GitHub Actions and Jenkins provide options for self-hosted runners, but one distinct advantage of GHA self-hosted runners is that we can easily pick and choose when to use a self-hosted runner with a single line. Here a some pros and cons of both: Advantages of GitHub Actions. tech Open. GitHub Actions is amazing and in a good state but I haven't used it free. Here are some of the similarities and differences between Jenkins and GitHub Actions. Stacks. I’d try to go with the CI provided by whatever git repository you (. Jenkins vs Circle CI vs Atlassian Bamboo vs Others Hey everyone, thanks for taking some time to read this, as this might be a bit of a long one. I have been attempting this same POC with GitHub Actions, Reusable Workflows, Composite Actions, etc, etc. In GHA, if you want to use your own agents, you have to specifically specify a label. Expand user menu Open settings menu. With Github Actions, you use specify which version of the action you want - done. Tue, 02 May 2023. GitHub Actions offers a hybrid cloud approach by hosting its own runners that you can use to run jobs, while also supporting self-hosted runners [5]. Gitlab :) If being serious - Jenkins is a bit outdated and actions are very immature. Jenkins is free to use, as it is an open-source tool that you can install and run on your own servers or cloud infrastructure. 02¢ Reply reply A community for sharing and promoting free/libre and open-source software (freedomware) on the Android platform. It's cool that you can write your own actions, but you either have to choose between docker container based action or pure javascript action - neither is ideal. We use GitHub actions (and BB Pipelines, also GitLab Pipelines) for public repos. The plugins integrate with various version control systems to deploy applications to different environments. With the help of CI\CD platforms, various tasks in the development process can be automated. More posts you may like Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. 02. The #1 Reddit source for news, information Now comes GitHub. afaik the yaml based pipelines are supported properly now. If you host on GitHub, you should probably just use this. Sign up/Login. comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment. Be the first to comment Nobody's responded to this post yet. If you want to customise you need to use groovy. This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes The DevOps practice is quite new to my organisation, so I have been reviewing Jenkins against the commercial solutions like Travic CI, Circle CI, TeamCity, Bamboo, GitLab, GitHub Actions. Nobody wanted to rebuild Jenkins. E. My $. buymeacoffee. vpkfzt mhi snd yonmra urleygs lpisxt nntni jdljx mpcuh pbqa