Nvenc vs av1. org with a feature request.

Nvenc vs av1 Considerably a brighter future will be promised with the joint of big Unless using AV1 AOM, it doesn't matter between H. If you *must* use ffmpeg, you'd have to post to trac. I'm av1_nvenc This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. 265 Nvenc will be the fastest, but the largest file size. I was using rigaya encoders for both. For example I have the pc hardware and upload speed to live stream 1440p at 60fps with a bit rate of Codec ID : V_AV1 Duration : 4 min 2 s Width : 1 920 pixels Height : 1 080 pixels I'm happy recording NVENC_HEVC 720p 20Mbps and re-encoding 20-second clips at 3Mbps for sharing on discord If you use GeForce RTX 40 series graphics cards, you will be able to use the Nvidia NVENC AV1 encoder which is better at compression than the NVENC HEVC and H. to/3lfyX51USA: https://a 😁 Remember to leave like and subscribe channel! 😁⚠ Notice ⚠The data shown in the video are demonstrative. If anything the chart shows why releasers chose M6 to transcode everything. The quality and size of the file may differ from Question: I did some close up comparisons of the videos, and the quality of the x265 file is pretty comparable to what NVENC produced. How is x265's file size so much smaller and has so much lower bit rate than NVENC? EDIT: I understood the trade-offs between size/quality regarding x265 vs NVENC, and knew NVENC was going to produce a bigger file. I can see the difference between OG vs. The new AV1 encoder can now give a 40% increase in efficiency with improved resolutions and quality, according to testing conducted by Nvidia. 37 (versus 96. EposVox tested Intel's new AV1 encoder against a variety of H. The A770 is recording with the AV1 As Figure 2 shows, at 1440p and 2160p, NVENC AV1 is 1. ) As for ordinary consumer, that could be a strong signal for more tech giants get in & with their efforts to push forwards the application of AV1 in the internet video sharing. If you want to test AV1 out on your CPU, then try recording as a demonstration of what it would be like to stream (CBR 6000). SVT-AV1 has quality control/consistency issues that can be mitigated or have been fixed in AOMENC-PSY. I don't want to waste my own time needlessly but when I read through threads on this issue I'm hearing a lot of contradictory stuff. For AV1: the difference between the encoders are negligible at this point. The PSNR curve looks to hook upwards from about QP<72 and has a break in gradient at around QP>200. This new performance headroom enables higher than ever image quality, including 8k. ffmpeg. 264 and HEVC at better performance. At this time, I don't see the point of someone using NVENC for AV1 encoding in its current state. Pick whichever makes the most sense to you, honestly. There were multiple mutually incompatible AV1 versions early in development, and some companies chose to not to implement either until the situation settles down. I was recording ff15 on lite mode (1080P locked 60FPS) and realized fast paced scenes I would get GPU overload on my RTX 3090. There is surprisingly little quality difference between medium and quite high CRF levels (with tiny corresponding files). [2] [3]The encoder is supported in many livestreaming and AV1 is much more computationally intensive than the more commonly used H. In my testing, even just with my eyes, encoding to 10 bit video with most lossy video codecs (HEVC & AV1 in particular) yields better coding efficiency than encoding to 8 bit. AV1 vs H265 . ( Nvenc HEVC , Nvenc x265) There's like 5 different ways to write the same I was confused between svt-av1, libx265, av1_qsv and hevc_qsv. Encoder: NVIDIA NVENC H. 7z for the latest version. 45x more efficient than NVENC H. SVT AV1 What's the Difference? AV1 and SVT AV1 are both video codecs developed by the Alliance for Open Media, but they have some key differences. If one needs faster then what AOMENC offers without one pass or rt, then use SVT-AV1. Now of course some images can't say everything but I recorded multiple minutes of gameplay and at 16000 kb/s and anything higher AV1 is just getting worse and worse compared to the other 2. I've been comparing Nvenc, x265, x264, and AV1 SVT while waiting for my Arc. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns. AV1 is the original codec that aims to provide high-quality video compression with improved efficiency compared to previous codecs. I think that x265 is the sweet spot. I’d be curious to know what a 2GB HEVC file, that takes 1 hour to encode, looks like vs a 1. If you have an Nvidia GPU, use the AV1 NVENC encoder for fast NVEnc-AV1 is 8 (eight) times faster than SVT-AV1 (see below). Hello, AV1 is generally more efficient than HEVC encoding, but for high quality output with less priority on file size reduction I would recommend trying -c:v av1_nvenc -preset p7 -tune hq -cq:v 20 -rc-lookahead 48-rc-lookahead can be adjusted based on the framerate of the input file, but usually it’s recommended to set this to double the framerate. You can increase these to 100,000 and The difference is amazing. No way should it be losing to Nvenc. I I see AV1 support has been added to sunshine and moonlight-qt My current contenders would be Nvidia RTX 4070 or AMD RX 7800XT. Personally, I use HVEC because I'm only running a 3080. I keep reading online the Nvidia's AV1 encoder is way better than AMD's. Numerous tests have been conducted to evaluate which codec offers better video quality. Understanding their differences and when each codec shines is critical for content creators, I'm surprised how close HEVC got to AV1 especially with higher (but still low by my standards) bitrates. PreAnalysis Won't Save AMF From Intel's AV1 Encoder. 5mbps Intel AV1 ~= 6mbps Nvenc in FPS games. Edit: After lots of updates, preset 4 at CRF 20 is what I have settled on. world/c/av1 due to changes in Reddit policies. 264 if the file size is Default nvenc presents in obs with cqf 18 for recording and 15000kbps for streaming. 265 Video Codecs: When it comes to choosing an internet-optimized codec, the two best options are HEVC or H. AV1 is superior in quality and compression, but it can be a problem for some users due to the limitation of compatible hardware. It was introduced with the Kepler-based GeForce 600 series in March 2012 (GT 610, GT620 and GT630 is Fermi Architecture). Especially if these mid-tier cards will also sport multiple NVENC chips. Intel has it's quick sync, NVIDIA the NVENC and AMD the VCE/VCN. Possibly hold for now until the midrange 40-series come out, as they have dual AV1 encoders that outperform both Intel ARC and AMD's implementations. 265) Question So I was experiencing GPU overload during a recording session. NVENC is the video encoder chip inside Nvidia GPUs, while AV1 is a video codec. i did some testing with 4k clips (raw quality) encoded to arc a380 qsv av1 and 4090 nvenc av1 vs hevc for both qsv and nvenc -- the average fps speed for av1 at best quality preset for both: nvenc 61. Curious on how far AV1 has come with OBS? Is nvdia with nvenc still the way to go? The end of the day I want to get whats best for streaming to twitch or youtube though. 265) is better at compression than H. What is better for AV1 encoding I have not seen any information regarding a direct fight between the 2 in a apples to apples comparison. The best encoder depends on your needs and hardware setup. The longest encodes with AV1-SVT took +9hours for 30-second clip with Ryzen 2700x/5600x. mp4 and transcodes it to two different H. benchmark. While nvenc is visually a league above the others [e: hardware encoders], CPU encoding is still miles ahead of all of consumer-hardware encoding in terms of bitrate/filesize at quality parity. current av1 encoders or x264. Programmatically tested different crf, global_quality and noted the vmaf and size. Considering just how efficient AV1 is, I think this is a decent comparison. g. For example, to get a same PSNR AV1 encoders have been more computationally complex and slower. However, according to the FFMPEG 7. So please watch in the highest quality pos It won't make a difference in quality on YT. The final file sizes suggest that libaom-av1 resists Using both driver’s built in recording functions, the 3060 is recording at in-game resolution – 1440p – at 60fps, and with a 30 mbps bitrate. If you do not have a ⬇️All technical details will be down here⬇️This video was uploaded in 8K to force YouTube to use AV1 on their end. 265 and lower those bitrates to that amount - once one has found the equivalent Nvenc VS Intel QSV? Any benefits to Nvenc or QSV when using handbrake to compress my movie/tv collection? It's a mix of 1080, 4K, and 4K HDR titles. In my case i bought and use Intel Arc A770, because when I transcode Blu-Ray to AV1 (via CPU = SVT-AV1) it takes 6,5-7 days non-stop encoding time. app/videos/eposvox-intels-world-first-gpu-av1-encoder-was-worth-the-hype-intel-av1-vs-x264-vs-nvencamfqs Video Quality vs QP at Various Presets. 5hr (SDR) and 3hr (HDR->SDR). To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Comparing compression quality on QHD 1440p 60fps Overwatch gameplay using Neflix's VMAF. AV1 vs. The benefits of AV1 are best used in unison with the multi-encoder design featured on the NVENC AV1 is more efficient than QSV AV1 on Arc, even if the advantage is slight. But for hardware encoding, it would be offloaded from the CPU to a dedicated encoder engine. 5Mbit at P1 vs P7 you should definitely see a difference. It aims to deliver high-quality video compression while being accessible to a wide AV1 is the latest widely supported codec out there, however it is even more computationally demanding. Let’s see how av1_nvenc behaves in QP mode across its presets. SVT AV1 What's the Difference? AOM AV1 and SVT AV1 are both video codecs that utilize the AV1 compression standard. I haven't tried Handbrake snapshot builds to encode with NVENC AV1 but I'm using NVENC AV1 in OBS to record my games. ly/NWHk5Office 2019 ($49) : Overall, SVT-AV1 was better than all, but I didn't feel like it blew QSV AV1 out of the water. The video quality of AV1/HEVC will be better than H. 264 encoders, including Intel's own Quick Sync technology, Nvidia's NVENC, AMD's AMF, and software-based H. Title was edited Nvenc AV1 (RTX 4090, 10 bit) QSV AV1 (Arc A770, 10 bit) You may be wondering why there is such an emphasis on 10 bit encoding despite the 8 bit source. 0 documentation, this value should theoretically go up to 255. NVIDIA NVENC AV1 vs. However, for most recording needs, Nvenc provides a good balance of quality and performance. It is well tuned for internet applications though, so you can get better quality video online using the same or less bitrate to It looks like that test was normalized for bitrate (size). Tl;dw SVT-AV1 preset 7 or 8 (afaik with the old version of SVT-AV1 that OBS currently ships) >>>>> Intel AV1 ~= x264 very slow >> Intel Quicksync > Nvenc >> AMF 3. NVENC is absolutely knocking it out of the park on encoding quality. (e. Comparison of 4K image quality in AV1 livestream 1. ¡Juegos más baratos en G2A!: https://www. 264 encoder. Get 25% discount on Gvgmall with my "SKAG" code!Windows 10 Pro ($16): https://biitt. 264 videos at various output resolutions and bit rates. Share Wondering myself I don't see to much difference. I was planning to buy a new GPU mostly for AV1 encoding, but I guess I'll stick with iGPU QuickSync-powered HEVC. I some times stream on twitch as a hobby. 264 encoders such as the AV1 vs. Help Which is better for getting sharper and better quality recordings with CBR? Using RTX 4090. I made a 30-second clip of multiple sources and did +100 versions of it through Handbrake. However, if you were to take the same source and let NVENC use 1. AV1 I think enabled new codec on YouTube or so I've been told. what I'd like to know is the delta. Considering that NVENC offers a better stream quality for games than x264 medium, the hardware solution is clearly preferable. I’m just wondering what is so good about AV1. Nvidia NVENC (short for Nvidia Encoder) [1] is a feature in Nvidia graphics cards that performs video encoding, offloading this compute-intensive task from the CPU to a dedicated part of the GPU. Rate Control: We recommend CQP, although VBR will also produce good results. 264 encode efficiency based on BD-SNR. 264 vs NVENC HEVC (H. Designed to support the rigors of professional content creators, NVENC preserves video quality with a higher accuracy than competitive encoders. 5GB SVT-AV1 file is like that takes between 1-3 hours to encode. NVENC when it comes to quality, and the opposite for file size, encoding time. Final Thoughts. Note that while using the GPU video encoder and decoder, this command also uses the scaling filter (scale_npp) in FFmpeg for scaling the decoded video output into multiple desired Oh, and don't forget AV1. Can I get the same ffmpeg -i input. I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. . AV1 is important if: You are a distributor of internet video Streaming on Twitch also counts here (when they allow AV1 that is) Streaming to YT does not You need to store a ton of videos efficiently Your bottleneck is your internet speed Using NVENC for OBS with link x265 and NvEnc PSNR versus bitrate x265 and NvEnc SSIM versus bitrate x265 and NvEnc VMAF versus bitrate So first take out, is that SSIM, PSNR and VMAF are not consistent within each-others. I prefer rav1e if I care about quality and pixel fidelity (pretty much always) or SVT-AV1 otherwise. You can only select Nvenc AV1 encoding for recording settings but not streaming settings. The chart also shows that you can chose AV1 and still gain quality even on the fast settings if you're willing to spend the time. The only difference will be the quality of the video which will only be visible at very small filesizes (with a very high QP, atleast I feel that way) But the format i'm soon aiming for is av1. g2a. For anything CPU vs CPU, there won't be any difference if you are using AMD or Intel. Here is a summary of the HEVC vs AV1 comparison based on the above parameters: Quality. 265, and AV1 encoding capabilities in speed, file size, and quality. Trying both can help you find the best fit. But if you push the bitrates low enough (like 1080p60 at 1000kbps), you'll probably see that NVENC and Quicksync for the most part is neck and neck, AMD only slightly behind in quality. It is worth noting that Premiere Pro, my video editor of choice, doesn’t actually support the AV1 codec yet, so I had to re-render the AV1 clips. Also, I can do a QSV AV1 encode in about 1. Or better yet, if a potential 4050 can outperform my 2060, I wouldn’t mind going down to budget-tier just for those encoders. The big advantage here is moreso that you are comparing a hardware encoder to a software encode and getting equal results. 264 . If you're targeting speed ranges AOMENC covers however I highly don't recommend SVT-AV1. Whichever faster CPU is better, so in this case, any Ryzen would be a better option than Intel. 264, and obviously AV1 (Below is the encoding speed tests conducted by Nvidia with Nvenc AV1 vs HEVC predecessor H. 0697) with the same video and bitrate. 264 vs AV1 vs H. 264, NVIDIA NVENC HEVC, or NVIDIA NVENC AV1 (RTX 40 series only). TL;DR of the TL;DR: NVENC is good, often better than CPU medium encoding. 264 and H. It would seem that the choice of preset makes only a minor difference to PSNR. 265 stays about the same since 6th gen. The quality and size of the file may differ from AV1, or at least SVTAV1, shines very well when you are really cramping down on the file size. Is that true? So AMD cards are not yet supported or tested for AV1 gamestreaming. Each encoder offers Streaming with the medium preset was not possible on the test system even at 30 fps. Run obs as admin and disable gpu hardware scheduling in windows as I found this causes obs to use more of the gpu chip and not just the nvencoder, quite a bit more e. Especially if you expect AV1 to be better by a margin in terms of say size, quality or speed. AV1 at 3Mbps and lower had bitrate conformity issues. Should it not be using P1-P6 and having options like b-frames etc? I. You can read more about it here. mp4 Keyframe placement. Bitrate and Max Bitrate (VBR): 40,000 Bitrate; 60,000 Max bitrate. So equal size but Arc AV1 was every so slightly better quality (VMAF 74 vs 72), but really those VMAF scores are going to have no perceptible difference when viewing. So if you're doing something offline, and the your output file is the final version (ie. CQ Level (CQ): 15 (you can decrease the number to get higher quality). The “-g” option can be used to set the keyframe interval. 264 and h. but then I read from other articles from this year, that the 264 has the best output quality for recordingso I'm getting quite literally conflicting answers The NVENC AV1 does not do that. 85% vs 46% cpu usage on X265, roughly same encoding time. ⭐ Watch this video ad-free on Nebula: https://nebula. 264 stand out as two of the most widely discussed codecs in the industry today, each with its unique strengths, limitations, and ideal use cases. 265, or AV1 if you have a system that supports it. Some of the latest AV1 encoders are now able to achieve encoding speeds comparable to or even faster than x265 in certain use cases. AOM AV1, developed by the Alliance for Open Media, focuses on providing a royalty-free and open-source solution for video encoding. Does that sound right? Handbrake only has only opions from FAST -> SLOWEST. I compared every clip on the Full comparison between H. V System Specs VCPU: r9 5900x (12c 24t)RAM: 32gb 2x16 @3600mhzGPU: rtx 3080 10gSSD: Crucial mx500 sata ssdEntering a new era where AV1 is going to become mai Would sell the GPU and go for a 3080. Unless they were in a hurry and didn't care for file size, which in my opinion is an unlikely scenario. e. I just did this moments ago to try it out on a new card. 5 fps and qsv 70 fps. Reply Both codes are pretty efficient and will treat every source different, so comparing results is hard. Reply reply I was recently asked why so few chips support decoding AV1 in hardware. However, if you just want to test nvenc's AV1, you can If AV1 requires more source-specific tuning (ie, newer film vs grainy older film vs B&W vs cartoon vs action with lots of motion vs non-action film without a great deal of high-motion) then I'm not sure that re-encoding my library will be worth it. Encode at CRF 28 but I imagine most people don't really care. With Intel Arc A770 (via hardware Conclusion about H. ly/b54F9Windows 10 Home ($14): https://biitt. 264 at that), aim for a 6th gen NVENC chip or newer On average, bitrates are between 4-8Mb/s for 2K and 6-12Mb/s for 4K (depends largely on how grainy the original is). Question I look it up, and it says 265 is better than 264, and HEVC is the 265. But still, I see three options on my gaming laptop: Intel QSV, NVENC, and I see an option that doesn't say anything next to it (it just has the fps and quality there). , if you were to take a 1080p source, and let NVENC use 60Mbit at P1 vs P7 there might not be much of a difference. Those produce VMAF scores above 95% mean an mostly keep the 1% low over 93% (dips to 90% here and there). AOMENC is merely limited to a higher efficiency range then SVT-AV1. AV1 will by far take the longest, but it will give you a much smaller file size. Decoding Speed: ⬇️All technical details will be down here⬇️This video was uploaded in 8K to force YouTube to use AV1 on their end. (This are rough numbers) At what point is encoding it worth the 500MB for example? None the less, the more testers, the more likely it’ll be fixed and improved, so good for you. x265 10-bit is a bit better though if you’re looking for compression and smaller file size. not being reprocessed again,) then you should really use CPU You're essentially deciding between poop (nvenc), less poop but still poop (x264,medium) and poop poop (amd) at low streaming bitrate of 2500-6000. Some people say nvenc and qsv render faster . Actually even the $120 Intel Arc A380 wins across the board in encoding against a 3090 Ti and 6950xt, in H. not an HDR fan! I've had several friends and family blindly compare several encodes and some even picked QSV AV1 over SVT-AV1 on some encodes, but no one picked x265. AV1 should be about 30% more efficient than H. NVENC offloads compute-intensive encoding tasks from the CPU to dedicated hardware on the GPU. However, I'm not seeing av1_nvenc even as a choice. A PSNR of 45dB is achieved around QP=48 and 40dB at QP=120. Below around 10000 kb/s AV1 is the clear leader though. I’m not looking to upgrade. The following command reads file input. 265 and AV1 are lossy codecs, the choice between them can still matter depending on factors like the source material, target bitrate, and compatibility requirements. 264 - low bitrate h. Software encoder does, at the cost of 12x longer encoding time (on this particular system I use). IMHO, the GPU-based encoders are only good for the thing they were specifically designed for e. Not sure if this fact At 16000 kb/s though, its getting flipped around an now AV1 is clearly the most blurry encoder. 5% disabled and around 15 to 20% when enabled, maybe a bug. 264, H. I need to get a new video card for my streaming PC. realtime/semi-realtime transcoding, low-latency broadcasting, remote dekstop/gaming AOM AV1 vs. However, I don't find it very well-tuned for the use cases where every detail needs to be retained (low CRF levels around 20 and It effectively matches Nvidia's tried and true NVENC encoder featuring a VMAF score of 96. AV1 takes the longest and shrinks the most, but may or may not require transcoding depending on your target AV1 NVENC was the clear winner with faster compression speeds, comparable file size, and better quality. The NVidia guys seem to have understood that the future of codecs is about speed. By default, AMF AV1's keyframe interval is 250 frames, which is a balanced value for most use cases. 264 (AVC) codec, but now there are several integrated and dedicated GPUs out there that come with partial or full support A question regarding encoding: NVENC H. However, with ongoing development and optimizations, the encoding speed gap between AV1 and x265 has been narrowing. But by that time X265 was already deployed en masse in the wild. EDIT: Thanks for the pointers. Yes, I am well aware hardware encode is inferior to software encode in terms of quality but I'm mostly just playing around with it. To quantify the quality improvements, we investigated peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and video multimethod assessment fusion (VMAF) scores for AV1 and H. It seems to be as fast as the Nvidia HEVC encoder with comparable settings, which is remarkable, because AV1 claims to have a higher encoder complexity than HEVC (in theory). Although x264 is getting quite a bit older (hence why powerful CPU's can handle it much more effortlessly), AV1 is the future option that can give you good quality at lower bitrates for streaming. H. NVIDIA NVENC H. Made an Excel of the data and encode times, sizes, etc. Most streaming services bottleneck h265. pl/testy_i_recenzje/nvidia-geforce-rtx-4090-founders-edition-recenzja-test I’ve found SVT-AV1 unsuitable for preserving fine detail at any preset, though otherwise the most actively developed and fastest. According to a recent MSU Codec Comparison report, AV1 is currently the leading codec in video quality, providing the same apparent visual quality while consuming 12% Więcej informacji o karcie NVIDIA RTX 4090 znajdziesz tutaj: https://www. Beyond that the main difference is 7th gen can decode AV1, and 8th gen can both decode and encode AV1 - so quality on h. AV1, HEVC, H. And now X266 is about to take over. This means QP 23 video of NVENC h265 would be the same filesize as QP 23 NVENC 264. mp4 -c:v av1_amf -align 1080p output. There's some guides on tuning NVENC for h265 but it seems like they don't exist for AV1 quite yet so I looked through Greetings! Was toying around with the encoder when I noticed that B-frames never appeared to be generated when using the -c av1 codec option - the output summary only ever lists IDR, I and P as encoded frame types. r/AV1 is available on https://lemmy. 264 - Which one is better? AV1 or HEVC (H. NVEnc-AV1 is 8 (eight) times faster than SVT-AV1 (see below). For example, in broadcast television applications, it is typically desired to have a comfortable channel It seems the 8th gen Nvenc is much better than previous versions and Nvenc AV1 can produce a similar result to SVT-AV1 preset 7/8 at the same bitrate (based on VMAF). Even when comparing 8 bit NVENC to 10 bit QSV, NVENC still manages to pull ahead ever so slightly. NVENC on the other hand did not skip frames at 60 fps. All will give the same video quality. For SVT-AV1 I recommend preset 5(/6) at CRF 24-28. x264 QuickSync x265 AV1 VP9 & NVENC on the RTX 2080, 2070 and 2060. Discussion I currently have a 3090 ti, the encoder on it is a beast. The results are there as a curiosity and should be taken with a grain of salt. quality preset i can sustain. Looks great with great compression - a 2m10s recording of Microsoft Flight at 4k@60 (though the game was getting more like 30fps) was 267MB mkv file. 265 or AV1-STV, both are very lossy: While both H. This makes x265 even better in the speed/quality tradeoff vs. 264. If I had a 4090, I would definitely record in NVIDIA NVENC AV1 offers substantial compression efficiency with respect to H. On the other hand, SVT AV1 is a software encoder The A770 is recording with the AV1 codec, again at 1440p60, this time at 10 mbps. nvenc av1 and qsv av1 have very similar vmaf scores at various bitrates on best presets. With the explosion of video content across platforms, the demand for efficient video codecs has grown exponentially. Subjectively. Full disclosure: I've got older hardware and no current hw encoders on my gpu (well, an outdated quicksync and nvenc which are a lot worse than x264). In my experience with NVENC, CPU encoding seems to result in like half the file-size so the 😁 Remember to leave like and subscribe channel! 😁⚠ Notice ⚠The data shown in the video are demonstrative. org with a feature request. AomEnc is the reference encoder and was the slowest but it’s much faster these days. If you are truly interested in streaming using your GPU encoder then never consider AMD until they have an AV1 encoder in their cards, it is obvious RADEON doesn't care about H. AV1 and H. I suppose the question is HVEC vs AV1 vs H264. I also used HEVC and it also looks just as good. That cpu h264 graph looks off. this leads to a astronomically large video file 1:N HWACCEL Transcode with Scaling. The choice between NVENC vs x264 ultimately hinges on your specific hardware setup and streaming objectives. NVIDIA NVENC achieves an encoding speed of 301 FPS, while SVT-AV1 reaches Nvenc will give you the fastest results at the fattest size per visual quality. It seems to be as fast as the Nvidia HEVC encoder with comparable settings, which is remarkable, because AV1 claims to have a higher encoder complexity than AV1 beats all other tested codecs, at all tested bitrates. Took several videos of different resolutions and varying content with each being 1 min each to test. So please watch in the highest quality pos The 8th-generation Nvidia video encoder, NVENC, is included in the most recent generation of NVIDIA graphics cards, the GeForce RTX 40 Series GPUs, which also enable AV1 encoding. If you're building a new setup and don't need AV1 (eg, Twitch streamers since they're still stuck on h. com/n/tsqdCompra tus artículos gamer en Amazon y ayúdanos a crecer:México: https://amzn. PSNR and VMAF are video quality met Time Difference: The encoding speed difference between NVIDIA NVENC and SVT-AV1 is substantial. Checks out in MPC when I look at the video details. ConstQP Rate Control in AV1_NVENC When using the constqp rate control mode in AV1_NVENC, I’ve noticed that the QP value can only be set between 0 and 51. Nvidia NVENC HEVC vs NVENC 264 for recording with OBS? I can't find consistent answers doign research. Sounds complicated lol, I actually tested out a few more things and think I'll use SVT AV1. 264; if possible Grab ffmpeg-git-full. ADA nvenc).