Palo alto lacp cisco suspended Moved from state Active to state Suspended critical lacp ethern link-do 0 LACP interface ethernet1/5 moved out of AE-group ae1. A port in passive mode will generally not transmit LACP messages unless its partner is in the active mode; that is, it will not speak unless spoken to. The same config is now put into a 3650, same scenario, and the ports goes into s - suspended state. We have default VLAN1 which is Learn how to enable the best security outcomes by using Palo Alto Networks solutions. 391: %EC-5-L3DONTBNDL2: Et0/1 suspended: LACP currently not enabled on the remote port. 001: % EC-5-L3DONTBNDL2: Gi0 / 2 suspended: LACP currently not enabled on the remote port. Palo Alto Firewalls in High Availability HA configuration. 0(3)I7(9) with Hello, Palo1(Active)(Inside seg) >>>(L2? L3-p2p?)7K1(VPC) Palo2(Passive)(Inside seg) >>> (L2? L3-p2p?)7K2(VPC) How should this be done in order to maintain redundancy? Create a new SVI and VPC for the inside firewall segment, then I would configure LACP active on PA as well as Cisco side. I am trying to configure LACP between PA 3020 Active / Passive and cisco switch. Both interfaces connect to an unmanaged D-Link switch. The wording of this is a little unclear. Discover and save your favorite ideas. I have a 7010 which i'm using to connect to two 5510's. I will have two PA-440s in Active/Passive High Availability mode. Agregace linek je skvělá pro zajištění redundance. About PAN-OS Hi, I am trying to get an aggregation link up between a Cisco and PA-4050 switch (v3. Enterprise Networking -- Routers, switches, wireless, and firewalls. First of all, if I'm not mistaken, the default setting for speed and duplex are auto-negotiate. In summary: to validate if it is possible to build a port-channel from Palo Alto, against a switch-stack (2 switches) pointing a connection to switch 01 of the stack and another interface to switch 02 of the stack. I have created a portchannel on the Cisco switch and put the 2 ports from the Active Palo and 2 ports from the Passive Palo into the same channel Hi, i have configured a multicassis etherchannel between some catalyst 2960x and two C9500-x configured in stackwise virtual. Also seeing this on the not that gets suspended: critical lacp ethern link-do 0 LACP interface ethernet1/1 moved out of AE-group ae1. In switch-1 two ports and Switch-2 two ports are bundled by LACP. 0 Helpful Reply. Selection state Selected 2023/09/23 08:40:29: djc-palo2 reports critical lacp event: LACP interface ethernet1/22 moved out of AE-group ae1. By clicking Accept, you agree to the To make a device move back from suspended state refer:How to Recover HA Pair Member from the Suspended State. tldr: Yes this is expected and perfectly fine, since the passive firewall is dropping all incoming packets to it's ports the Cisco will move the ports into a suspended state. This subreddit is for those that administer, support or want to learn more about Palo Alto Networks firewalls. The ports have the following config: Turn off LACP on Palo Alto, using "mode on" on Cisco, and Passive Link State set to Auto instead of Shutdown on Palo Alto, fail over time is about 10 seconds. 08. Checked the logs on both switches and Good morning OyeSlacker--I am thinking that you might have misconfigured something when you were trying to set speed and/or duplex. In this configuration, if Cisco 3750-E stack running 15. I am Hello All, I have two cisco 9200 switches connected back to back. Updated on . HA Group 1: Moved from state Passive to state Suspended 2023/09/23 08:40:29: djc-palo2 reports critical lacp event: LACP interface ethernet1/21 moved out of AE-group ae1. And it connected to the company network. ) Suspended just means it couldn't be bundled with the LACP port channel for some reason. LACP allows Cisco switches to manage Ethernet channels between switches that conform to the 802. I have one vPC connecting the two 5510's to the 7010. I have disbaled spanning tree on my VLANs "no spanning-tree vlan xxxxxxxx" (mode pvst enabled) Thanks I've specified the protocol LACP on the physical ports before as well, but only 1 of the ports would come up with the configs I have now, at least 2 of the physical ports come up in the port-channel, but the 3rd port always You are having 2 ports on PA side in a single port channel group and on Cisco side each - 594593 This website uses Cookies. Cisco VSS configuration for Solved: Hello Experts! I'm setting up a new vpn tunnel to a partner. In Active / Standby. I have a v I've tried a number of things and every which way I can't get the other 2 interfaces to no be in suspended mode. It is Active/Passive on the firewalls but LACP is Active on all components (PA HA and Switches). The integration of Cisco ® Catalyst ® Software-Defined Wide Area Network (SD-WAN) with Palo Alto Prisma SSE cloud enables customers to enhance the security of their branch internet traffic through effective redirection. When we disable the preemption, this does not happen, and failovering worked perfectly through different scenarios. Once the As described in "LACP and LLDP Pre-Negotiation for Active/Passive HA", LACP pre-negotiation will pre-negotiate LACP in HA passive or Non-Functional state. Each peer must have a unique LACP System ID in an active/active deployment (Network Interface Ethernet Add Aggregate Group System Priority). I've got a Palo Alto FW HA Active/Passive pair, connected to two different Cisco switches (one for Edge traffic, the other as a DMZ switch). This command puts the port in suspended state if it does not receive any LACP PDUs. log during the timestamp of the issue gathered from step 1. The Palo Alto firewall pair must also have up to date application, url, and threat databases. This document describes how to troubleshoot Link suspended trunk auto auto 10Gbase-SR sh int e1/1 Ethernet1/1 is down (suspended(no LACP PDUs)) admin state is up, Dedicated Interface Belongs to Po1 Hardware: 100/1000/10000/25000 Ethernet Hi @Chango ,. This will result in a loss of connection to the server. I''m encountering this issue, when i boot all the stackwise at the same time the LAG work proprely, but if the only standby We don't have physical acces to the firewall and the switch at this moment. On the other side is not a Cisco switch but a PAlo Alto firewall and all interfaces on that end are configured correctly to be in the same aggregated link. Solved: Hello, I will define a Port-Channel Interface in mode LACP, in a Switch Catalyst 3850: ! interface Port-channel4 switchport mode access end To this port-channel interface, I associate two interfaces: ! interface GigabitEthernet1/0/4 For PAN-OS versions 8. 1 the Palo Alto Networks firewall supports LACP, the Link Aggregation Control Protocol which bundles physical links to a logical channel. Which means if all interfaces in the group have equal priority firewall will use the last three bits from the session ID Getting started with LACP using PAN-OS OpenConfig plugin. Was this guy for real? Network security engineer Here we have a CP6200p NGFW, i set a bond group to connect with Cisco switch, below is the configurations on both Checkpoint & Cisco side. Palo Alto calls it “Aggregate Interface Group” while Cisco calls With CSCtn96950, by default, standalone mode is enabled. We are having a problem setting up a port channel/aggregated ethernet interface using two 1 gig connections between our Palo Alto (model 5020, PAN-OS 8. Have a look at this link This VPC has been working for years, but yesterday one link goes down for a LACP issue: NexusA# show lacp interface Eth9/5 Interface Ethernet9/5 is suspended Channel group is 320 port channel is Po320 PDUs sent: 2644275 PDUs rcvd: 2854056 Markers sent: 0 Markers rcvd: 0 Marker response sent: 0 Marker response rcvd: 0 Unknown packets rcvd: 0 Overview. Good Day everyone, I am fairly good at configuring Cisco but this I cannot get working. 3ad)? Hi guys, Its been a while but can anyone tell me if they see any issues with the following design i have come up with. I would also recommend to enable the LACP pre-negotiation LACP and LLDP Pre-Negotiation for Active/Passive HA by selecting check box under: LACP > High Availability Options > Enable in HA Passive State. , using channel-group <group> mode active, it may be the partner device is not sending LACPDU. Leveraging Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Secure Internet Gateway (SIG) templates, the implementation process becomes efficient and I connected two Nexus 7K switches. I am able to send traffic across these links but they are clearly not functioning as aggregated interfaces as i loose pack Testing a PA-220. " If both sides are Cisco devices, PAGP (Cisco proprietary) and LACP are both supported. This weekend I started changing the etherchannel inks to LAcP. Using AP225 APs, I found I had LACP at my disposal. PDF - Complete Book (50. Cisco: interface Port-channel2 switchport access vlan 254 switchport mode access. Everytime I build out a Port Channel interface, the ports stay in a suspended state. The LACP settings we have are the Cisco + Splunk: It’s a new day for your data. V článku chci ukázat, jak něco takového nastavit mezi Palo Alto boxem a Cisco switchem. I have two link in the group and have configured L3 sub interfaces to seperate VLANs. The FirePOWER is r We have a 4 member port channel setup. Pavel Before high availability can be enabled on the Palo Alto firewall pair, both firewalls need to be the same hardware model. 2020-04-12 00:19:25. In the older switch (C3560X) the physical links would remain active in standalone (individual) state. Sound like LACP is not working with PAN and we had to set PaGP, which, on the other hand, cannot be configured to aggregate interfaces of different Catalyst switches, even if configured as a single virtual switch (i. Solved: Ive created two port-channel groups and one of them won't work It keeps showing that they are not-in-bndl and sometimes there are other erros. Active and Active mode and transmission rate: slow ===== LACP System log::::LACP interface ethernet1/19 moved out of AE-group ae2. 2. With LACP disabled we have a 1 ping loss during fail-over events. Filter Version. log file below . Thanks Jean Hi All I have 2 x Palo Alto 3020 FW's. When we do this on switch it will generate one system ID which would be virtual and will use it for lacp negotiation ( it will not use physical system ID since it will be two in numbers and each Troubleshooting LACP going down or flap issue Environment. Usually if a link is suspended it has not received a LACP message from its peer on that link. The PAN-OS version must be the same, except when there is a temporary version mismatch during a software upgrade. Create an Aggregate group with 2 interfaces. Flags: D - down P - in port-channel. 3ad) was not supported. Configure Cisco nexus switch NXOS02 with an LACP priority of 16384 so that it is the preferred device for managing the Hello, We have setup a LACP port between a Synology NAS & a Stack of 2 Cisco 2960x switches. Thus, a firewall in Passive or Non-functional HA state can communicate Palo Alto - LACP konfigurace 13. Getting Started. Note that the cisco 9300 switch does not allow me to t Traffic and logging suspended due to unexported logs; Traffic and logging are suspended since traffic-stop-on-logdb-full feature has been enabled; Audit storage for <name> logs is full. Kind Regards. LACP support was introduced in verion 6. like so: EVPRODIDF05#sh ether sum. x & above, the following Palo Alto Networks firewalls support LACP: PA-400, PA-500, PA-800, PA-3000 Series, PA-3200 Series, PA-3400 Seri How to Configure LACP 262674 Palo Alto Firewalls; Supported PAN-OS; High Availability Active/Passive; LACP pre-negotiation enabled. I cannot get them out of it. After enable LACP. We are I am attempting to configure two ports for LACP and I am only seeing one interface as member under the PortChannel that I created. If this is feasible, this configuration is supported in Palo Alto. 1. Please give a suggestion to solve this. Most probably one interface from aggregate group is connected to one switch and other to 2nd switch and both the physical switches are virtually clustered into one. I'm trying to LACP trunk a pair of Nexus3000 C3064PQ Chassis running 7. 1. Device is in HA "suspended" state. 2). 0. I am looking for a cabling recommendation diagram for LACP portchannels from Cisco Switch Stacks or Nexus to HA Palo Alto Pair. We are not officially supported by Palo Alto Networks or any of its employees. Includes design and deployment considerations for centralized management, resource monitoring, and advanced logging capabilities. ACI has a L2 link to 6500 switch with an SVI running EIGRP and advertising all networks to 6500. Hello Dear Forum. Does this mean that LACP passive mode ports will become disabled (suspended) unless the neighbor device is explicitly configured with LACP I have tried different modes of LACP on both Cisco and Palo Alto side but never can get both ports on Cisco to be bundled or green sign on AE bundle on Palo Alto. 2021 | Tag Palo Alto. Does anyone know what would cause a Nexus port-channel (vpc) to be in suspected mode against Cisco FirePOWER 2110 series appliance? The interface status shows that for the port-channel shows that it is in suspected mode (with no LACP PDUs). The product comparison indicates that it Solved: Recently started upgrading our 3850's to 16. Thus, a firewall in Passive or Non-functional HA state can communicate LACP configure between PA and cisco switch . The Cisco switch interface for one of the FW pairs is Solved: Hi All, PA-3060, PAN-OS 7. Focus. ADMIN MOD LACP from PA-3050 to Cisco Nexus 9K . We lost power to both switches and all the ports in the ether channel went into suspend status. As the device If it's simply suspended from the LAG and running as a dynamic LAG i. 3ad protocol. the port channel is up but two of the member interfaces are showing up/down. I bundled the aggregate links, To perform failover test, one of the firewalls was suspended; Failover was successful, but when making the suspended firewall functional again, it is stuck in Initial (Leaving suspended state) Firewall FW1: Active Firewall FW2: Initial (Leaving suspended state) Firewall FW1: Firewall FW2: Firewall FW2 ha_agent. 2(25)SEC and later. I have created a portchannel on the Cisco switch and put the 2 ports from the Active Palo and 2 ports from the Passive Palo into the same channel Our security department is switching from a Checkpoint configuration to a Palo Alto firewall. Is there any white paper regarding the connectivity to the active/standby firewall without L4 to L7 integ Solved: Hello Everyone I am trying to build out a LACP Etherchannel between a Dell R540 and a Cisco 2960XR. When one of the interface become suspended, we use ICMP or remote access to this switch will fail , but By default, LACP sets a port to suspended state if it does not receive an LACP PDU from the peer. Supported PAN-OS; The individual nodes are configured with a priority value 2015/03/08 19:55:44 critical lacp ethern nego-fa 0 LACP interface ethernet1/2 moved out of AE-group ae1. Can someone indicate why my ethernet ports are in suspended state for some reason, i need an indication why this may be and what i can do to fix this issue. If the number of interfaces you assign to the group exceeds the Max Ports, the remaining interfaces will be in standby mode. Nexus can obviously use vPC feature so it may be slightly different than a switch stack. Deployment Guides. There are two ISP's at my site which are plugged into two Palo Alto firewalls in Active/Passive mode. Tentative Hold Time range (sec) can be disabled (which is 0 seconds) or in the range 10-600; default is 60. Pavel We are setting up 2 nx 9k switches with port channel (LACP) enabled so we can have multiple links for redundancy. Members Online. among the 3 ports only one port is in use and the remaining 2 ports are going to suspended state. Also, having a static route on L2 directly pointed towards the SVI IP on 6500 as a next hop address. Introduction. When interfaces on a Cisco 3750 are configured as part of a port-group using LACP (passive) what are the timers or delays associated with putting one of the ports into "suspend"? What is required to get a port out of "suspend"? Here is the scenario we saw prompting me to ask this question. Book Title. That is I have a PA440 in a HA config (active/passive) on FW 10. When I try channel-group 2 mode on without channel-protocol lacp the links come active (green), but LACP is not negotiated or sensed on the link. " This is the HP switch. 13c4. I'm wondering what steps to take as regards packet captures on firewall interfaces to figure out why negotiation will fail. When the tunnel connects, it seems to run fine. Thus, a firewall in Passive or Non-functional HA state can communicate Learn more about how Cisco is using Inclusive Language. Expand all | Collapse all. Palo Alto Firewall. Hi, I am designing ACI connectivity to Palo Alto firewall in Active/Standby mode. Two firewalls in HA and two switches in a stack. Selection state Selected 2015/03/08 19:55:45 critical lacp ethern lacp-up 0 LACP interface ethernet1/2 moved into AE-group ae1. interface TenGigabitEthernet1/0/11 switchport access vlan 254 switchport mode access channel-protocol lacp channel-group 2 I am planning a new site and want to make sure my detailed design will not be a problem. I have created a portchannel on the Cisco switch and put the 2 ports from the Active Palo and 2 ports from the Passive Palo into the same channel When I add the line channel-protocol lacp there is no change, still suspended with amber LEDs. This is probably an LACP negotiation problem. Today's task was get LACP working on a Palo Alto, so traffic and fault tolerance could be spread across multiple members of a Cisco 3750X switch stack. Consider the below setup, each firewall has one physical link to separate switch members of the stack. Chapter Title. Solved: Hello all, We have a customer who is trying to create a 2 gig ports Port-Channel with our router and the LACP is not working. I then connect the 2 GB interfaces from FW01 and 2 GB from FW02 down to a cisco switch in VSS cluster. H - Hot-standby (LACP only) R - Layer3 S - Layer2 I am not using LACP on the switch -- each firewall has one connection to one switch for each of the three VLANs. This is the first time I've dealt with them. I have a working port channel on a 3750x 3 switch stack running version 15. And I know it works on Palo Alto as other AS bundle is up. after reconnecting everything in the correct order, the passive unit can't You can also configure EtherChannels manually. Cheaper models (< AP220) don’t do LACP and only have STP for redundancy. 3. For this scenario, assume a simple setup. When I am applying that LACP in ports, one of that port is going to suspended State. Aggregate Interfaces and LACP. When we force the mode ON on both sides of the port-channel it works and we have connectivity but as soon as we Configure all Cisco Nexus port channels as 802. New here? Get started with these tips. (Make sure both links are in LACP active mode to force the messages) A couple things: 1. We have a need to secure a localized VLAN behind the Palo Alto's. Post Reply Learn, share, save. The data traffic is highly effected with the failovering and spanning-tree recalculations on the Cisco switches. E) and use two interface config port-channel use LACP mode . will it be possible to create vPC to each Firewall and have an L3Out to each? 2. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more. 1 and above. It also safeguards the connection from the network to the internet. About 30 seconds after enabling LAcP on the access switch I lost connectivity with ALL switches (I lost access to our entire network). I have created the AE group interface Inside with the ip address. Provides design guidance for using Palo Alto Networks firewalls to secure applications deployed in Cisco ACI. PA-Rack-9500(config-if)#exit I am trying to configure LACP between PA 3020 Active / Passive and cisco switch. 2 with QNPC (40G). Switch stack cabling currently: Cisco SW#1 - Port gi1/0/1 ---> PA3050 (Active) Secure Access - Palo Alto. Additional Information. the core VSS I have 5 etherchannels configured in variouse configuration some are "on" some are desirable and LACP. The two links in questions is eth1/3 on both switches going to UCS MLOM ports. Both devices have LACP bundles towards a Cisco router. Securing Applications in a Cisco ACI Data Center: Design Guide. I have added 2 interfaces to the AE Group on each FW. %ETC-5 This is what I am getting Port-channel12 is up, line protocol is up (connected) Hardware is EtherChannel, address is 0024. html was invaluable when I was trying to understand the interaction of PA LACP with Cisco switches. There were no software changes last period. Then it takes 20-30 minutes for the adjacency to come back. The Cisco switches do not support VPC. I'm trying to setup a layer 2 port channel between my Nexus 9Ks and the Palo Firewall for vlan 200 traffic only. The Palo Alto devices do not support LACP, therefore I wanted to know if either PaGP or any other Link Aggregation specification will work between the N7Ks and the Palo Alto devices other than LACP (possibly 802. While creating the Port channel I have tried different modes of LACP on both Cisco and Palo Alto side but never can get both ports on Cisco to be bundled or green sign on AE bundle on Palo Alto. on the inside. First, h hi, I am facing this same issue, i had configured 3 links between 6509 to vmware server. I was able to find out that the PA-200 does not support aggregating interfaces with LACP, but the PA-220 is rather new and I have not been able to find a definitive statement about it. 0) and a Cisco switch (model WS-C3750G-24T (IOS: 12. Aggregate interfaces that are not running LACP should be defined on the connected devices to firewall. Reading Also on the Cisco router the portchannel towards the passive firewall goes into a suspended state since it detects that LACP is not enabled on the remote port. Hello, Can I create an LACP etherchannel between two cisco stack. Thus, a firewall in Passive or Non-functional HA state can communicate Solved: Hi Just wondering if anyone here has successfully gotten LACP to work on a PA-800 series FW (set to passive) and Cisco Switch (set - 288074 This website uses Cookies. 2 MB) View with Adobe Reader on a variety of devices Hello ACI Gurus. PAgP is a Cisco-proprietary protocol that you can only run on Cisco switches and on those switches that licensed vendors license to support PAgP. 10 in active/passive. Cisco has designed Secure Access to protect and provide access to private applications, both on-premise and cloud-based. That´s expected, as the port doesnt receiev any lacp pdus anymore. 3ad defines LACP. Some of my first concerns: Standard Cisco LACP is mostly configured unconditional, which means the ports don’t come up if LACP isn’t detected on the link. configuration below. We noticed during testing that LACP causes 8-10 ping loss during a fail-over event. These will connect to a stack of Cisco C9300s. In V-wire if the Links are aggregated then the firewall could forward the packets to the other ports in AE , that will cause the LACP to not come between peers. 248c (bia 0024. No new traffic sessions will be accepted until disk space is freed up; Minimum Retention Period (<num> days) Violated for segnum:<num> type:<name> Dear community, I have a LACP Portchannel configured on a Catalyst connected to a Nexus vPC. IEEE 802. Currently we have a pair of PA-3060 running 6. Since PAN-OS version 6. However, you can enable an interface on a passive firewall to negotiate LACP and LLDP prior to failover. 1, LACP (Link Aggregation Control Protocol, 802. Reply reply A weird issue moving a server from a 6509 to a Nexus has made me look at the LACP suspend-individual command. When looking at ether channel status, we see 3 ports are in correct state (P), but the fourth one is in suspended mode (s) and we can't understand why. The way current environment is communicating between ACI and legacy 6509 switches is via a L2 link with a SVI created on it running EIGRP on both sides ACI and 6509. I encountered the same issue in connecting PA5220 to Cisco Nexus 9508 N9K-X9636PQ line card with Palo Alto + Cisco QSFP-40G-SR-BD transceivers. With our validated design and deployment guidance, you can reduce rollout time and avoid common integration challenges. We have checked everything, change the switch interface to make it accept non supported transceivers, change the fiber cables, swap the ports, hard coded speed and duplex setting, remove LACP, remove dot1q In Virtual Wire mode, the Palo Alto Networks device can pass Cisco Link Aggregation Control Protocol traffic in vwire only when the links are not aggregated on the PAN-fw. Cases are opened with both Palo Alto and Cisco. Thank you all for your help. I'm including a diagram to show a simulation of what we're looking to do. However, when I change channel-group 1 to "active" (making it LACP) the links go into Suspended mode because they are not receiving LACP BPDUs from the passive IPS. Selection state Unselected(Link down) Now when this config is used in a 3560X and the end device is on standby (not communicating LACP) the ports goes into I - stand-alone state. Hi @VPenkivskyi,. The Palo Alto takes over the same IP address and has the ospf password. it always seems to be the second one that is plugged in. With no configuration changes on the vSphere host or vDS, but going in and changing switch interfaces or trying to trunk the ports, sometimes the other 2 will be the P and the ones that were previously working are now suspended. 6 and now seeing OSPF failures every 2-4 days. Need to create an Aggregate group and add 2 x GB interfaces to the Aggregate Group. Passive Link state set to auto. Location. recently we've moved our server room to a different room and have reconfigured some of out network components. 0(2)SE2 with a 4 port port-channel, simple trunk configuration and LACP. 085 +0400 Got port 82 event, link 0, speed 4, duplex 2 When a firewall leaves suspended state, it goes into tentative state for the Tentative Hold Time after links are up and able to process incoming packets. The same PA has a LACP configured with a HP Aruba stack with no issues. Pokud jedna linka odpadne, velmi rychle ji zastoupí další. 10-h5 connected to a 9200 Cisco stack with a LACP configured between them. We have worked with TAC but can't seem to PA FW 1 (the active one) has port 5 and 6 connected to Gi1/0/5 and Gi2/0/5 on the Cisco side. Check the system logs with filter set to (subtype eq lacp) under UI: Monitor > Logs > System show log system direction equal backward subtype equal lacp; Check the l2ctrld. ASA on our side Palo Alto on theirs. All the switch ports that the firewalls are connected to have portfast enabled. LACP. I am currently migrating a two sets of Palo Alto Physical firewalls directly counted to old Cisco 6509 switches to ACI. Documentation Home; Palo Alto Networks; Support; Live Community; Knowledge Base; PAN-OS OpenConfig Administrator’s Guide: LACP. On a virtual wire, the Palo Alto Networks firewall can pass Cisco LACP traffic only when the links are not aggregated on the firewall. Flap-Max Timer Setting The flap-max is the number of times a device is We have cisco WS-C2960L-24TS-LL (Version:152-6. Are there other spanning tree related configurations to check on a Cisco switch when set for portfast? Thanks Hi, I would just like to verify the normal behavior of LACP in an Active/Passive HA setting. The 40G links are bundled in AE1 with LACP enabled. My concern is, can I enable LACP on Palo Alto side and make it a routed interface and assign IP to it and on the nexus side they will configure a VPC, make it a L3 and configured an IP on it so on the Palo Alto side, it appears only as 1 I'm experiencing an issue with a setup of aggregated ethernet interfaces configured with LACP simply for redundancy connections between our HA Active/Passive firewalls and Cisco ISR 4451 routers. If the enclosure switches to the interconnect bay Hi, I have two 4500-X on which I want to activate an LACP : interface Port-channel3 switchport switchport mode trunk ! interface TenGigabitEthernet1/1/14 switchport mode trunk channel-protocol lacp channel-group 3 mode passive OR active end TenGigabitEthernet1/1/14 is up, line protocol is down (susp If a firewall uses LACP or LLDP, negotiation of those protocols upon failover prevents sub-second failover. Reading the documentation, Cisco says its possible to have Ggabit Etherchannels on 10 Gigabit interfaces. e. the two switches were connected through an ether channel (2 ports on each switch) in active mode. I noticed the firewall LACP rates on the firewall, ethernet1/1 & ethernet1/2 are both setup for fast, while it thinks is partner has a slow rate. Can someone look at one side of my config and see if I have an issue on it? I'll try to get the If a firewall uses LACP or LLDP, negotiation of those protocols upon failover prevents sub-second failover. Contents. 1 . Any else seeing The process will continue until the primary device moves into a suspended state (3 times by default). As per RFC: If devices have different transmission rates, each uses the rate of its peer. Meaning that I do expect the passive firewall to speak (transmit) as it has been spoken to by active firewall. I have tried setting the I have a pair of Palo Alto firewalls in Active/Standby mode connected to legacy 6500 switches. Palo Alto Firewall; LACP Configured; Procedure. Just have few queries - 1. We run OSPF between our cisco routers and the checkpoint today. 021: % EC-5-L3DONTBNDL2: Gi0 / 3 suspended: LACP currently not enabled on the This subreddit is for those that administer, support or want to learn more about Palo Alto Networks firewalls. This is my configuration interface Port-channel12 description SERVER Gi1/0/12_Gi2/0/12 switchport access v We have an HA A/P PA-7050 cluster running 7. log when make FW2 functional: Resolution. Their suggestion was to use LAcP on the cross stacked etherchannel links. I want to implement etherchannel between my cisco switches with an avaya switch. This may not seems to be a big issue, until I try to send WOL to the end device. If a firewall uses LACP or LLDP, negotiation of those protocols upon failover prevents sub-second failover. For example, on Cisco switches, the port channel mode for the aggregate interfaces should be set to "On. On a virtual wire, if the links are aggregated, then the firewall could forward the packets to the wrong port in Aggregated Ethernet, which will cause LACP not to function between peers. Randomly the adjacency will fail after the Palo is not seeing 4 hello. It is between a Cisco ASA and a Nexus. On the active firewall the LACP negotiates properly but on the passive firewal Enter the Max Ports (number of interfaces) that are active (1 to 8) in the aggregate group. 1Q trunk links. lacp suspend-individual is a default configuration on Cisco Nexus 9000 series switches. One of the 2 ports in the bundle always goes in to suspended. So if one ISP fails the default Hey there - been staring at this for a while and just can't see why one of my interfaces won't come up in an LACP aggregate. By clicking Accept, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance your community and translation I tried config LACP on two switch Layer 3 by Pnetlab as below: but it just show error: *Feb 17 08:09:55. 4. 1 and haven't change since (at least from what I know). Topology example Link Aggregation methods other than LACP for Nexus 7706 The customer has Palo Alto Firewalls that have to connect to a Nexus 7K (7706). It is I have config LACP between PA3400 and Cisco Switch everything work fine implement test on standalone mode Cisco eth1/1 (po1) PA eth1/1 (ae1) - 543937 This website uses Cookies. PAN-OS 7. Download PDF. I will have an LACP port-channel connecting one port of each Cisco switch (ports g1/0/1 and g2/0/1 I have two 10G ports on a Cisco Catalyst 3750X connected to two ports on a HP c7000 Blade Enclosure (te1/1/1 & te1/1/2 connected to two separate interconnect bays). 0(2)SE8, attempting to bring up port channel to 2921 router. "LACP is supported on cross-stack EtherChannels from Cisco IOS Software Release 12. Mon Feb 06 20:40:02 UTC 2023. However, all are welcome to join and help each other on a journey to a more secure tomorrow. I've checked the individual port settings one by one and they all look the same to me. Thank you @OtakarKlier and @MP18 for the replys,. 248c) Description: MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 0/255 Encapsulation ARPA, loopbac This is slightly different from device going to suspended state due to non-functional loop. I started with on port on one member of a stack of 2960's. When I do a show ip OSPF neighbor I see the checkpoint, when we Hi everyone, I'm trying to set-up a Subinterface on a Aggregate group with LACP on a PA-3020 and a DELL 6248 switch in a test envoirment. * May 31 21: 26: 11. But then a ping from a host connecte. Selection state Unselected(Link down) l2ctrld. When I shutdown one Port of the vPC the connected port on the catalyst goes into lacp suspended state. *Feb 17 I am trying to configure LACP between PA 3020 Active / Passive and cisco switch. 9 MB) PDF - This Chapter (1. Also assume the firewalls are in active/passive. 2(55)SE1). Before making the node functional, consider the following recommendations : Investigate and the fix the issue of the interface and/or path monitoring flaps. After the configurations and the interconnection of the switches, the port-channel goes into "suspended" mode. However, should the tunnel go down, it will not come back up unless they initiate the traffic. Create VLAN 10 on all switches. It down and hover the mouse on it show below info: ethernet1/2: I would configure LACP active on PA as well as Cisco side. The firewall uses the LACP Port Priority of each interface you assign (Step 3) to determine which interfaces are initially active and to determine the order in which standby I have two VSS 6500 installations one set of 6503 as core router/switch and a pair of 6509 as collasped distribution. First link comes up and bundles, but I get this on the second one: Jan 5 13:04:34 PST: %EC-5-CANNOT_BUNDLE2: Gi2/0/51 is not compatible with Gi1/0/51 and will be suspended (vlan mask is different) But the p Hi ALL I have two Cisco 9300X-24Y-E stacked switches. Palo Alto Firewalls; Supported PAN-OS; High Availability Active/Passive; LACP pre-negotiation enabled. LACP (Link Aggregation Control Protocol) configured. On the Cisco log I see Gi2/0/5 suspended: LACP currently not enabled on the remote port. Solution 1: LACP sets a port to the suspended state if it does not receive an LACP bridge protocol data unit (BPDU) from Hello ALL, can anyone let me know what the reason that some interfaces show that are in suspended state when using the sh etherchannel summary command. This is achieved through the implementation of multiple security methods and layers, Hi, Are the core switches in VSS mode or standalone? What type of switches are they? The Portchannel will distribute traffic based on the hashing algorithm configured and sends the traffic through multiple physical links. This Knowledge Article will show us how to resolve an improperly configured Link Aggregation configuration case where misconfiguration on local or peer device shows the AE interface to Cisco recommends that you have knowledge of these topics: • Catalyst 9000 Series Switches Architecture • Cisco IOS® XE Software Architecture %ETC-5-L3DONTBNDL2: Gig1/0/1 suspended: LACP currently not enabled on the remote port. Thanks in advance, stay tuned, best regards channel-protocol lacp; channel-group 2 mode active; Problem is, the Etherchannel wont stay up. The vendor has said that a passive IPS will not send these LACP BPDUs. Changed the LACP transmission rate to slow, and restarted both the firewall and the switch. Selection state Unselected(Link down) info port ethern link-ch 0 Port ethernet1/2: MAC Down critical lacp ethern link-do 0 LACP interface ethernet1/2 moved out of AE-group ae1. Oct 19 2023 15:43:16 EDT: %ETC-5-L3DONTBNDL2: Twe1/0/3 suspended: LACP currently not enabled on the remote port. VLAN Interface IP Address All VLAN interface configuration settings sync except for the IP address ( Network Interface VLAN ). if i remove the cable from cisco switch which is in use, Before PAN-OS 6. I - stand-alone s - suspended. The debug of LACP shows clearly this: * May 31 21: 26: 11. By clicking Accept, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance your community and translation experience. Does the channel group need to be the Please forgive my ignorance, when it comes to Palo Alto's. Is this the Working on a 5430 with 10. I am also seeing a Suspended interface on one of the ports. Switch interfaces exchange LACP packets only with partner interfaces with the active or passive mode configuration. If I assign an IP on the default VLAN to the Aggregate Group everything works but I can't seem to get the Subinterface to work, I've tested a Subinterface on a standard interface which also worked. This is to the physical links in Po3 to the Passive Palo Alto Firewall: Oct 19 2023 15:43:16 EDT: %ETC-5-L3DONTBNDL2: Twe2/0/3 suspended: LACP currently not enabled on the remote port. Environment. we are running 2 pa-3320 in Ha Actiave/passive mode both of which have aggregated ports. 5, I have configured with HA in A/P. 17 Please see below: LACP: - 310666 This website uses Cookies. The default settings on the Palo Alto surprised me a bit, as I was expecting it to default to active and enable fast timers, but this was easy They are connected to a Ubuntu (linux) box with LACP enalbled. The aggregate interface can up when LACP is not enable. So this document is still valid. Passive link state is auto and the physical interfaces are up on the replica but AE interfaces are down, and on the switch that is communicating with the passive it is suspended. It may still be forwarding traffic. Firepower Management Center Configuration Guide, Version 6. During testing, if request high-availability state suspend, the data ports got disabled. Servers using 'teamed' nics, (LACP) can fail if the switch is rebooted because the server fails to respond to LACP BPDUs. Does this mean that LACP In suspended state, communications still happen between the firewalls in the HA pair and this is not the same as disabling HA. Cisco, Juniper, Arista, Fortinet, and more are welcome. When no response is received from an LACP peer, ports in the port channel are moved to suspended state. The reason why we get the message "LACP currently no enabled on the remote port " is because LACP is not enabled on the member ports. PA FW 1 (the active one) has port 5 and 6 connected When no response is received from an LACP peer, ports in the port channel are moved to suspended state. comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment spann0r /12/all-sorts-of-things-about-lacp-and-lags. 1ax or 802. The issue was that when a couple of storage nodes are setup in a HA cluster and you manually failover (say node B), then B will not send any LACP traffic over the bundled links. Resolution. I have created a portchannel on the Cisco switch and put the 2 ports from the Active Palo and 2 ports from the Passive Palo into the same channel I have a pair of Nexus9000 93180YC-EX configure with vPC and each Nexus 9k is connected to a Nexus 2k I notice my interface port channel is in (suspended(no LACP PDUs)) SW-1# show lacp interface eth1/1 Interface Ethernet1/1 is suspended Channel group is 101 port channel is Po101 PDUs sent: 154 PDU Symptom The Firewall is configured for Link Aggregation using LACP as the bundling protocol Please see HOW TO CONFIGURE LACP for assistance in configuring LACP.